rhino_torus

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With readOnlyHint=false, the agent knows it's a mutation, but the description adds no details about side effects, permissions, or what object is created beyond 'torus primitive (mesh approximation)'. Behavioral traits are insufficiently disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words, but it could benefit from slightly more detail; conciseness is good but not at the expense of completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has multiple parameters and an output schema, the description is too brief. It does not explain return values or parameter usage, leading to incomplete context for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not mention any parameters. Schema coverage is 0%, so the description fails to compensate for the lack of parameter documentation in the schema, leaving the agent without guidance on required inputs like center, major_radius, and minor_radius.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool adds a torus primitive and specifies it's a mesh approximation in standalone mode, which distinguishes it from other primitives like spheres or cylinders, though not explicitly compared to siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternative primitives or when mesh approximation is appropriate, leaving the agent without context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.