Skip to main content
Glama
EaseHee

rhino-mcp

by EaseHee
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to rhino-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • rhino-mcp

      rokibul-mist
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Drive McNeel Rhino 8 and Grasshopper from Claude through the Model Context Protocol.
      500
      MIT

    • RhinoMCP

      reer-ide
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects Rhino and Grasshopper to Claude AI via the Model Context Protocol, enabling prompt-assisted 3D modeling, scene manipulation, and control through tools like object creation, layer management, and code execution.
      29
      MIT

    • rhino-mcp

      Aaradhya-Dev-Tamrakar
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to Rhinoceros 3D and Grasshopper, enabling generative NURBS geometry, parametric definition solving, layer manipulation, and viewport capture.
      1
      MIT

    • vn-autocad-claude

      andyluu98
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to control AutoCAD—draw, edit, query, layers, blocks, annotations, screenshots, plot to PDF—using plain language.
      8
      6
      MIT

    • Rhino MCP

      quocvibui
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered 3D modeling in Rhino 8 through 135+ tools for geometry, transformations, booleans, layers, materials, and more, using natural language.
      6
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 244 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose, even with 244 tools. Overlaps are minimal and descriptions clearly differentiate them. For example, multiple boolean tools are well-separated, and viewport capture tools have specific use cases.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools start with 'rhino_' (or 'gh_' for Grasshopper), but the verb-noun ordering is inconsistent: some use verb_noun (e.g., rhino_list_objects) while others use noun_verb (e.g., rhino_object_info). This could cause minor confusion for an LLM.

    Tool Count4/5

    244 tools is large, but the server covers an extremely broad domain (3D modeling, analysis, BIM, rendering, Grasshopper, etc.). Each tool has a defined role, so the count is justified, though a more focused scope might be easier to navigate.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set is remarkably complete, covering creation, modification, analysis, annotation, rendering, BIM, Grasshopper integration, and utilities. It supports a full modeling workflow with few obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources