rhino_rebuild_curve

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate mutation, but description does not clarify side effects like whether original curve is replaced or new curve is created. Adequate but incomplete.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single efficient sentence, no wasted words, front-loaded with key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present and a simple mutation purpose, the description is mostly complete. Could briefly state that it modifies the existing curve in place, but not critical.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool description lacks parameter explanations; schema coverage is 0% per context, and the description must compensate but does not. Schema has property descriptions but the tool description itself adds no value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it rebuilds an existing curve using point count and degree, distinguishing it from curve creation tools and surface rebuilding tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like rhino_curve_point_at or rhino_rebuild_surface; lacks when-not-to-use or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.