List recipes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide readOnlyHint=true, so the safe read nature is established. The description adds domain context about recipe structure but does not disclose additional behavioral traits such as rate limits, error conditions, or response format. It does not contradict annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, and every clause adds value. No filler or redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only list tool, the description covers purpose, recipe concept, usage timing, and optional filtering. With complete schema coverage and annotations, nothing essential is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema describes the only parameter (mode) with an enum and full explanation ('Filter to one scene mode; omit for all recipes'), achieving 100% coverage. The description merely echoes this by saying 'Optionally filter by mode', adding no extra semantic value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the tool lists DualStream's installed recipes and explains what a recipe is, distinguishing it from apply/save actions. The verb 'List' plus resource 'recipes' is specific, and the mention of 'use before apply_recipe' clarifies its role among siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives direct usage guidance: 'Use before apply_recipe to discover recipe ids, or before authoring to avoid duplicate names.' This clearly indicates when to use the tool and implies alternatives (apply/save recipes). It also notes optional mode filtering.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.