No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 30 tools
Most tools target distinct resources and actions, such as scene control, source parameters, and automations. Minor overlap exists between get_state_snapshot and get_scenes/get_active_scene, but descriptions clearly differentiate a full resync snapshot from targeted queries. set_source_effects and set_effect_enabled are related but distinct (applying vs toggling filters).
Tool names overwhelmingly follow a clear verb_noun pattern with snake_case, e.g., get_, list_, set_source_, create_, save_, delete_. The only inconsistency is mixing 'get' and 'list' for read operations (get_scenes vs list_recipes), but the pattern remains predictable overall.
At 30 tools, the set exceeds the typical well-scoped range of 3-15 tools. While each operation is distinct and serves a broad streaming application feature set, the large number is likely to overwhelm agents and increase selection error in practice.
The set covers scene creation/activation, comprehensive source manipulation, automation CRUD, and event handling. Notable gaps include scene deletion/rename, recipe update/delete, and widget enumeration, which would leave agents unable to fully manage resources without workarounds.