No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool targets a distinct calculation (sizing, voltage drop, derating, thermal withstand, loop impedance, report, standards provenance), but size_cable explicitly duplicates the behaviour of the individual check tools, so an agent may be unsure whether to call size_cable or the granular checks. The descriptions do clarify that the individual checks are for standalone use, keeping the overlap manageable.
All seven names follow a clean snake_case verb_noun pattern (check_short_circuit, get_standards_info, size_cable, calculate_voltage_drop, calculate_derating, check_loop_impedance, generate_calculation_report). The verb set is varied but idiomatic and predictable.
Seven tools is well-scoped for a cable sizing/verification domain, with each tool earning its place as a distinct engineering check or report generator. No filler or redundant tooling exists beyond the intentional granular/aggregate split.
The surface covers the full sizing workflow: derating inputs, voltage drop, adiabatic fault checks, loop impedance, selection, standards provenance and reporting. Minor gaps remain, such as listing/inspecting the configured cable dataset or exporting results beyond an ASCII report, but agents can work around these.