set_active_view

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, description alone must disclose behavior. It states it changes the UI display but does not mention that no model modification occurs or any potential side effects. Adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is very concise, using only two sentences plus a docstring. Front-loaded with the primary action and includes prerequisite guidance without unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description covers the core action and prerequisite adequately. Could mention failure cases (invalid view name) but overall sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description must compensate. It only repeats the parameter name and says 'name of the view to activate,' lacking specifics like case sensitivity or match requirements. Minimal added value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it switches the active view in Revit to a specified view, differentiating it from sibling tools like list_revit_views (listing) and create_view (creation).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises to use list_revit_views first to obtain valid view names, providing clear context for when to use this tool. Does not mention alternatives or when not to use, but the guidance is sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.