get_revit_view
Export a named Revit view as an image file. Provide the view name to retrieve a rendered snapshot of the 3D or 2D view.
Instructions
Export a specific Revit view as an image
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| view_name | Yes |
Export a named Revit view as an image file. Provide the view name to retrieve a rendered snapshot of the 3D or 2D view.
Export a specific Revit view as an image
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| view_name | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description must disclose behavior but only says 'export an image', omitting details on permissions, file format, resolution, or whether the view must be active.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, short sentence without wasted words, but lacks key details that could be added without verbosity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-parameter tool, the description provides minimal viable purpose but lacks details on output format, error handling, and prerequisites, leaving gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The sole parameter 'view_name' has no description in schema or description; with 0% schema coverage, the description adds no meaning beyond the parameter name itself.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Export' and the resource 'a specific Revit view as an image', making it distinct from sibling tools like get_current_view_info or list_revit_views.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like export_document or get_current_view_info, nor any prerequisites or context for invocation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Demolinator/revit-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server