Skip to main content
Glama
Demolinator

Revit MCP Server

by Demolinator

create_pipe

Creates a pipe between two specified points in a Revit MEP model. Supports setting system type, pipe type, level, and diameter, with auto-detection for missing parameters.

Instructions

Create a pipe in the Revit model between two points.

Requires a project with plumbing families loaded (MEP template). All dimensions in millimeters.

Args: start_point: Start point {"x", "y", "z"} in mm end_point: End point {"x", "y", "z"} in mm system_type: System type name (e.g., "Domestic Hot Water"). Auto-detects if omitted pipe_type: Pipe type name (e.g., "Copper"). Auto-detects if omitted level_name: Level name. Defaults to nearest level diameter: Pipe diameter in mm ctx: MCP context for logging

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
start_pointYes
end_pointYes
system_typeNo
pipe_typeNo
level_nameNo
diameterNo
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. It only mentions 'Create' implying mutation, but lacks details on side effects, reversibility, permissions, or state changes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with a summary, prerequisites, and a parameter list. It is concise but front-loaded appropriately.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema or annotations, the description should explain return values or success criteria. It only covers inputs, leaving behavior post-execution unclear.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 0% description coverage, but the description adds semantic meaning for all 6 parameters (e.g., coordinates in mm, auto-detect, default behavior), significantly enhancing understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a pipe in the Revit model between two points,' specifying the action (create) and the resource (pipe). It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_duct and create_mep_system.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description notes prerequisites (MEP template with plumbing families) and units (millimeters), but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Demolinator/revit-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server