isw_get_paycode_status
Retrieve the current status of a generated paycode to verify its validity, usage, or expiration.
Instructions
Get status of a generated paycode.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| paycode | Yes |
Retrieve the current status of a generated paycode to verify its validity, usage, or expiration.
Get status of a generated paycode.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| paycode | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Lacking annotations, the description only implies a read operation (Get status) but provides no details on behavior such as error cases, idempotency, or permissions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise single sentence that conveys the core action without fluff, appropriate for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, the description should hint at return values or potential outcomes. It lacks this, making the tool only partially specified.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description must compensate but adds no meaning beyond the parameter name. The paycode format or origin is not clarified.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves the status of a generated paycode, distinguishing it from create/deactivate siblings. However, it does not elaborate on what 'status' entails.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this versus similar tools like isw_get_transaction_status, nor any prerequisites or context for usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Dairus01/Interswitch-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server