isw_fetch_customer_card_details
Retrieves customer card details linked to a specific account number.
Instructions
Fetch customer card details by account.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| extra | No | ||
| accountNumber | Yes |
Retrieves customer card details linked to a specific account number.
Fetch customer card details by account.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| extra | No | ||
| accountNumber | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behaviors like what happens on missing account, whether it returns multiple cards, or side effects. It only says 'by account,' adding minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise but under-specified. The single sentence lacks necessary detail; conciseness should not come at the expense of clarity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the large sibling list, no output schema, and nested object parameters, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to provide enough context for correct tool selection and invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% coverage in property descriptions. The description mentions 'by account' but does not elaborate on the required 'accountNumber' parameter or the optional 'extra' object, leaving their semantics unclear.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (fetch) and the resource (customer card details) with a specification of 'by account.' However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like isw_fetch_cards_by_account, which likely has a similar purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites or exclusions provided. The description is too brief to offer any usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Dairus01/Interswitch-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server