Previous value: -"Ambition of the AI being deployed: gen1=automation/RPA, gen2=GenAI, gen3=agentic."New value: +"Ambition of the AI operating model: gen1 = automation/RPA, gen2 = GenAI, gen3 = agentic. Paired with readiness to set pace_gap severity — gen3 on any readiness below agile, or gen2 on siloed, is severe; a higher tier against a slower operating model widens the gap and raises the drag."

Previous value: -"Optional; defaults to universal. Reserved for future vertical adjustments."New value: +"Optional; defaults to universal if omitted. Reserved for future vertical drag-rate adjustments — does not change the result today. Call list_taxonomy for accepted values."

Previous value: -"Organisational readiness, honest self-assessment: agile = cross-functional, fast decisions; traditional = functional hierarchy; siloed = rigid, hand-off heavy."New value: +"Organisational readiness, honest self-assessment: agile = cross-functional, fast decisions; traditional = functional hierarchy; siloed = rigid, hand-off heavy. Agile readiness yields minimal drag at any tier; the mismatch between a fast AI tier and a slower operating model is what generates the Organisational Drag Cost."

Previous value: -"Approximate annual revenue in EUR."New value: +"Approximate annual revenue in EUR (must be ≥ 0). The result scales with this: annual_drag_eur is returned as an absolute range and as drag_rate, a fraction of this revenue (e.g. 0.02 = 2%)."

Previous value: -"Share already automated (0–1)."New value: +"Share already automated (0–1). Low automation makes manual effort the dominant drag and selects Automate; the un-automated remainder is the addressable share."

Previous value: -"Median wall-clock days per instance, end to end."New value: +"Median wall-clock days per instance, end to end. Long cycles relative to touch-time signal wait/latency drag."

Previous value: -"Annual licence/vendor/tooling spend on the process in EUR."New value: +"Annual licence/vendor/tooling spend on the process in EUR. Added to the labour baseline and shifts how much of the saving is labour- vs spend-addressable."

Previous value: -"Human touch-time in hours per instance."New value: +"Human touch-time in hours per instance. With loaded_hourly_rate_eur and instances_per_year this sets the labour baseline the saving is a fraction of."

Previous value: -"Distinct owners/systems an instance passes through."New value: +"Distinct owners/systems an instance passes through. Weighed against the per-function median; many handoffs make handoff drag dominant and point to Consolidate & re-sequence."

Previous value: -"Process volume: how many times it runs per year."New value: +"Process volume: how many times it runs per year. Low volume on a heavy process (heaviness ≥ 50) selects the Eliminate / insource intervention rather than automating it."

Previous value: -"Fully-loaded labour cost per hour in EUR."New value: +"Fully-loaded labour cost per hour in EUR (salary + on-costs). Multiplies fte_hours_per_instance × instances_per_year into the annual labour baseline."

Previous value: -"Optional. Org change-absorption capacity (caps realised saving). Defaults to traditional."New value: +"Optional. Org change-absorption capacity — agile / traditional / siloed — which caps the realised (net) saving below the gross potential. Defaults to traditional."

Previous value: -"Fraction of instances reopened/reworked (0–1)."New value: +"Fraction of instances reopened/reworked (0–1). When rework is the dominant drag factor the intervention becomes Quality controls, and it also sets the addressable share for that path."

Previous value: -"Optional. How much of the above was measured vs defaulted (0–1). Governs confidence; defaults to 0.7."New value: +"Optional 0–1. How much of the above was measured versus defaulted. Governs decision_confidence proportionally — lower it when you estimated inputs so the verdict stays honest. Defaults to 0.7."

Previous value: -"Touch-time ÷ cycle-time (0–1). The remainder is wait."New value: +"Touch-time ÷ cycle-time (0–1). The remainder is wait; a low value means the process is mostly waiting, which pushes the intervention toward Consolidate & re-sequence."

Previous value: -"Business function to benchmark. Must be one of the list_taxonomy function values."New value: +"Business function to benchmark — must be one of the list_taxonomy function values. Selects the base revenue-uplift and cost-reduction rate ranges (returned as fractions of revenue) and the value drivers."

Previous value: -"Industry whose multiplier to apply. Must be one of the list_taxonomy industry values."New value: +"Industry whose multiplier to apply — must be one of the list_taxonomy industry values. The returned industry_multiplier is applied to the function base rates; pass \"universal\" for the un-adjusted rates."

Added value: +"Inputs for a change plan after a Fix or Stop verdict. industry, revenue_eur, function, ai_tier and readiness must match the scoring call so the plan is built against the same case. scores and work_architecture may be copied from score_initiative; omitted pillars are estimated and make the plan provisional. resistance_type and risk_type are optional diagnostics that select the play, and omission triggers a named inference plus the next question to ask."

Previous value: -"gen1=automation/RPA, gen2=GenAI, gen3=agentic."New value: +"Ambition of the AI being deployed: gen1 = automation/RPA, gen2 = GenAI, gen3 = agentic. Interacts with readiness — a more ambitious tier running on lower readiness widens the pace-layer gap, which discounts the modelled EUR value even when the four pillar scores are strong."

Previous value: -"Business function where the AI will operate."New value: +"Business function where the AI will operate, as one of the accepted enum values — selects which benchmark value drivers and rate ranges apply. Call list_taxonomy for the exact strings if unsure."

Previous value: -"Your industry. See list_taxonomy if unsure."New value: +"Your industry, as one of the accepted enum values — used to select the benchmark rate multiplier applied to the modelled EUR value. Call list_taxonomy for the exact strings if unsure."

Previous value: -"Organisational readiness. Honest self-assessment."New value: +"Organisational readiness, honest self-assessment: agile = cross-functional, fast decisions; traditional = functional hierarchy; siloed = rigid, hand-off heavy. Sets the value-capture rate and, paired with ai_tier, the pace-layer drag — lower readiness against a higher tier reduces the captured value. Self-report is gameable: when the user has real process numbers, call infer_readiness first and pass its measured classification here instead."

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Optional. What sits behind a low change-enablement score: \"will\" = people do not want the change (power shifts, fear, no case for change), \"skill\" = people cannot yet do it (capability and capacity gap). Selects between a coalition-building play (Kotter 1-2 + ADKAR Awareness/Desire) and an owner-and-capability play (ADKAR Knowledge/Ability). If you do not know, omit it: the engine infers from readiness (agile infers skill, traditional/siloed infers will) and marks the play provisional. Ask the user \"is the resistance about not wanting this, or not being able to do it yet?\" and re-call to sharpen.",
+  "enum": [
+    "will",
+    "skill"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}

Previous value: -"Approximate annual revenue in EUR."New value: +"Approximate annual revenue in EUR (must be ≥ 0). Scales the whole output: the disclosed AI BVF planning rates are applied as fractions of this figure, so the modelled EUR value range grows with it. A rough order-of-magnitude estimate is fine."

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Optional. The nature of a high governance-risk score: \"regulatory\" = statute applies (EU AI Act, GDPR Article 22, DORA), \"reputational\" = the risk is how failure looks and lands publicly, \"operational\" = the system failing quietly inside a process. Selects between a regulatory remediation sequence, visible trust guardrails, and a proportionate governance review. If you do not know, omit it: the engine infers (gen3 tier, or a regulated function/industry, infers regulatory) and marks the play provisional.",
+  "enum": [
+    "regulatory",
+    "reputational",
+    "operational"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}

Added value: +"OPTIONAL, and each pillar inside it is optional. The four AI BVF pillars, each an honest 0–100 self-assessment, combining deterministically into the verdict: governance_risk ≥ 70 OR financial_return ≤ 20 returns Stop; strategic_alignment, financial_return and change_enablement all ≥ 60 with governance_risk ≤ 40 returns Accelerate; everything else returns Fix. Pass ONLY the pillars the user has real evidence for — do NOT invent numbers for the rest. Missing pillars are estimated deterministically by the engine from disclosed AI BVF planning assumptions, the response reports which via pillar_basis and scores_used, decision score is haircut by how much was estimated, and a fully-estimated pass can never return Accelerate (it returns Fix pending confirmation). So call immediately with whatever the user gave you, then ask for evidence on the estimated pillars and re-call to firm the verdict up."

Previous value: -"Sponsor, owner, funded change budget (0-100)."New value: +"Optional; when omitted, estimated from readiness (agile 55, traditional 45, siloed 32 — always below the 60 floor, because an unevidenced change capability is unproven). Sponsor in place, owner named, change budget funded (0–100, higher is better). Must be ≥ 60 for an Accelerate verdict."

Previous value: -"Strength of modelled return (0-100)."New value: +"Optional; when omitted, estimated from the disclosed AI BVF planning range for the function (40–52, never enough to clear 60 unmodelled, never low enough to force a Stop). Strength of the modelled return (0–100, higher is better). A value ≤ 20 forces a Stop on its own; ≥ 60 is one of the four conditions required for Accelerate."

Previous value: -"Regulatory / reputational exposure. Higher = more risk (0-100)."New value: +"Optional; when omitted, estimated from tier and regulated context (gen1 30 / gen2 42 / gen3 55, +10 in a regulated function, +8 in a regulated industry — agentic AI in regulated finance estimates at 73 and forces a Stop until governance evidence exists). This pillar is INVERTED: higher means MORE risk. ≥ 70 forces a Stop on its own; must be ≤ 40 for Accelerate."

Previous value: -"How clearly this moves a board-level KPI (0-100)."New value: +"Optional; estimated at 50 (unproven) when omitted, since alignment to a board KPI cannot be read from context. How clearly this moves a board-level KPI (0–100, higher is better). Must be ≥ 60 — together with financial_return ≥ 60, change_enablement ≥ 60 and governance_risk ≤ 40 — for an Accelerate verdict."

Removed value: -[
-  "strategic_alignment",
-  "financial_return",
-  "change_enablement",
-  "governance_risk"
-]

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Evidence that workflows, roles, decision rights and measures are ready. Pass only what is known. Explicit gaps and omitted checks block Accelerate until all four checks are evidenced.",
+  "properties": {
+    "decision_rights_defined": {
+      "description": "True only when decision, override and escalation rights have named human owners, false when authority remains unclear.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "measures_updated": {
+      "description": "True only when performance measures and incentives reflect the redesigned work, false when the old measures remain.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "roles_redesigned": {
+      "description": "True only when affected roles, accountabilities and capability expectations have been rewritten, false when roles remain unchanged.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "workflow_redesigned": {
+      "description": "True only when the end-to-end workflow has been redesigned around the AI and retained human judgement, false when the existing workflow remains.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -[
-  "industry",
-  "revenue_eur",
-  "function",
-  "ai_tier",
-  "readiness",
-  "scores"
-]New value: +[
+  "industry",
+  "revenue_eur",
+  "function",
+  "ai_tier",
+  "readiness"
+]

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Reproducibility record: engine version, the rules that fired, and the resolved inputs. Deterministic, no timestamps. If the verdict is challenged months later, the same inputs on the same engine version reproduce it exactly.",
+  "properties": {
+    "bvf_version": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "engine": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "engine_version": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "inputs_used": {
+      "description": "The resolved inputs the result was computed on, including estimated pillar values.",
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "note": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "rules_fired": {
+      "description": "The rules that actually fired, in order: estimation, gates, classification, value arithmetic.",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "The change-leader layer: a specific, sequenced route from Fix or Stop toward Go, aimed at the organisation. Present for Fix/Stop, absent when the initiative is already Accelerate. Present this to the user as the plan, not as raw data.",
+  "properties": {
+    "binding_constraint": {
+      "description": "The one thing standing between this initiative and a Go. Lead with this; a single named blocker gets acted on where a list of four gets skimmed.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "cost_of_waiting": {
+      "description": "The cost of delay framed as a decision rule: fix if the plays cost less than the waiting, stop if they cost more.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "cost_of_waiting_eur": {
+      "description": "Estimated organisational drag over the plan window, {low, high} in EUR, from the pace-layer model. The price of sitting in Fix.",
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "honest_stop": {
+      "description": "Present when the truthful call is Stop rather than Fix. Surface this verbatim; it is the most valuable sentence in the response when it appears.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "plays": {
+      "description": "Named change plays, worst pillar first, each selected from the failing pillar AND the organisational context. Every play works two altitudes: the organisation (Kotter) and the person (Prosci ADKAR).",
+      "items": {
+        "properties": {
+          "diagnosis": {
+            "description": "What is actually blocking, in plain language.",
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "diagnostic_questions": {
+            "description": "Questions to put to the organisation to sharpen or challenge the play. Ask these before executing.",
+            "items": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "type": "array"
+          },
+          "id": {
+            "description": "Play identifier, e.g. coalition-first, regulatory-remediation, value-rescope.",
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "org_move": {
+            "description": "The organisation-level move (method + action), typically a Kotter step.",
+            "type": "object"
+          },
+          "owner": {
+            "description": "The role that owns the play, to be filled with a named individual.",
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "person_move": {
+            "description": "The individual-level move (method + action), typically an ADKAR stage.",
+            "type": "object"
+          },
+          "pillar": {
+            "description": "The pillar this play repairs, or pace_gap for the cross-cutting operating-model play.",
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "provisional": {
+            "description": "True when the play was inferred from readiness/tier/function rather than told via resistance_type or risk_type. When true, ask the diagnostic questions and re-call with the answer to sharpen the plan.",
+            "type": "boolean"
+          },
+          "source": {
+            "description": "The named method behind the play: Kotter, Prosci ADKAR, EU AI Act, benchmark sources.",
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "steps": {
+            "description": "Sequenced actions, in order. Order matters: e.g. desire before change budget.",
+            "items": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "type": "array"
+          },
+          "stop_condition": {
+            "description": "Present when the honest escalation from this play is Stop, and the condition that triggers it.",
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "timeline_weeks": {
+            "description": "Expected duration range in weeks, [low, high].",
+            "items": {
+              "type": "number"
+            },
+            "type": "array"
+          }
+        },
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "position": {
+      "description": "Where this Fix sits between Go and Stop. near_go = a funding decision waiting on evidence; near_stop = one adverse finding from Stop, run only the first play then re-score.",
+      "enum": [
+        "near_go",
+        "contested",
+        "near_stop"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "position_detail": {
+      "description": "One-paragraph read of the position, written for the organisation.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "rescore_gate": {
+      "description": "What must be true, and by when, for the re-score to arbitrate. Fix is a decision with a deadline, not a limbo state.",
+      "type": "object"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Optional three-question feedback route, present only for Fix/Stop verdicts. The page records the response anonymously only when the user chooses an answer; no assessment data is attached.",
+  "properties": {
+    "question": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "url": {
+      "format": "uri",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "question",
+    "url"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "description": "Meaning and limits of compatibility fields. Present these labels when explaining the result.",
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -"Confidence in the verdict if the recommendations land, 0-100."New value: +"Projected heuristic decision score, 0 to 100. The target remains conditional on work architecture and evidence review."

Previous value: -"gen1=automation/RPA, gen2=GenAI, gen3=agentic."New value: +"Ambition of the AI being deployed: gen1 = automation/RPA, gen2 = GenAI, gen3 = agentic. Interacts with readiness — a more ambitious tier running on lower readiness widens the pace-layer gap, which discounts the modelled EUR value even when the four pillar scores are strong."

Previous value: -"Business function where the AI will operate."New value: +"Business function where the AI will operate, as one of the accepted enum values — selects which benchmark value drivers and rate ranges apply. Call list_taxonomy for the exact strings if unsure."

Previous value: -"Your industry. See list_taxonomy if unsure."New value: +"Your industry, as one of the accepted enum values — used to select the benchmark rate multiplier applied to the modelled EUR value. Call list_taxonomy for the exact strings if unsure."

Previous value: -"Organisational readiness. Honest self-assessment."New value: +"Organisational readiness, honest self-assessment: agile = cross-functional, fast decisions; traditional = functional hierarchy; siloed = rigid, hand-off heavy. Sets the value-capture rate and, paired with ai_tier, the pace-layer drag — lower readiness against a higher tier reduces the captured value. Self-report is gameable: when the user has real process numbers, call infer_readiness first and pass its measured classification here instead."

Previous value: -"Approximate annual revenue in EUR."New value: +"Approximate annual revenue in EUR (must be ≥ 0). Scales the whole output: the disclosed AI BVF planning rates are applied as fractions of this figure, so the modelled EUR value range grows with it. A rough order-of-magnitude estimate is fine."

Added value: +"OPTIONAL, and each pillar inside it is optional. The four AI BVF pillars, each an honest 0–100 self-assessment, combining deterministically into the verdict: governance_risk ≥ 70 OR financial_return ≤ 20 returns Stop; strategic_alignment, financial_return and change_enablement all ≥ 60 with governance_risk ≤ 40 returns Accelerate; everything else returns Fix. Pass ONLY the pillars the user has real evidence for — do NOT invent numbers for the rest. Missing pillars are estimated deterministically by the engine from disclosed AI BVF planning assumptions, the response reports which via pillar_basis and scores_used, decision score is haircut by how much was estimated, and a fully-estimated pass can never return Accelerate (it returns Fix pending confirmation). So call immediately with whatever the user gave you, then ask for evidence on the estimated pillars and re-call to firm the verdict up."

Previous value: -"Sponsor, owner, funded change budget (0-100)."New value: +"Optional; when omitted, estimated from readiness (agile 55, traditional 45, siloed 32 — always below the 60 floor, because an unevidenced change capability is unproven). Sponsor in place, owner named, change budget funded (0–100, higher is better). Must be ≥ 60 for an Accelerate verdict."

Previous value: -"Strength of modelled return (0-100)."New value: +"Optional; when omitted, estimated from the disclosed AI BVF planning range for the function (40–52, never enough to clear 60 unmodelled, never low enough to force a Stop). Strength of the modelled return (0–100, higher is better). A value ≤ 20 forces a Stop on its own; ≥ 60 is one of the four conditions required for Accelerate."

Previous value: -"Regulatory / reputational exposure. Higher = more risk (0-100)."New value: +"Optional; when omitted, estimated from tier and regulated context (gen1 30 / gen2 42 / gen3 55, +10 in a regulated function, +8 in a regulated industry — agentic AI in regulated finance estimates at 73 and forces a Stop until governance evidence exists). This pillar is INVERTED: higher means MORE risk. ≥ 70 forces a Stop on its own; must be ≤ 40 for Accelerate."

Previous value: -"How clearly this moves a board-level KPI (0-100)."New value: +"Optional; estimated at 50 (unproven) when omitted, since alignment to a board KPI cannot be read from context. How clearly this moves a board-level KPI (0–100, higher is better). Must be ≥ 60 — together with financial_return ≥ 60, change_enablement ≥ 60 and governance_risk ≤ 40 — for an Accelerate verdict."

Removed value: -[
-  "strategic_alignment",
-  "financial_return",
-  "change_enablement",
-  "governance_risk"
-]

Previous value: -"Optional 0–1. How grounded the four pillar scores are in real evidence versus estimated from context. Defaults to 1 (treated as measured). If the organisation lacks formal change-readiness or risk metadata, estimate the pillars from what you know AND set this lower to say so — decision confidence is reduced proportionally and a caveat is attached, instead of returning a falsely confident verdict on soft inputs."New value: +"Optional 0 to 1 input-quality factor. The default ranges from 0.5 when all pillars are estimated to 1 when all are supplied. Supplied values still require evidence review. Lower this factor when the supplied pillars rest on weak evidence."

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Evidence that workflows, roles, decision rights and measures are ready. Pass only what is known. Explicit gaps and omitted checks block Accelerate until all four checks are evidenced.",
+  "properties": {
+    "decision_rights_defined": {
+      "description": "True only when decision, override and escalation rights have named human owners, false when authority remains unclear.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "measures_updated": {
+      "description": "True only when performance measures and incentives reflect the redesigned work, false when the old measures remain.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "roles_redesigned": {
+      "description": "True only when affected roles, accountabilities and capability expectations have been rewritten, false when roles remain unchanged.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "workflow_redesigned": {
+      "description": "True only when the end-to-end workflow has been redesigned around the AI and retained human judgement, false when the existing workflow remains.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -[
-  "industry",
-  "revenue_eur",
-  "function",
-  "ai_tier",
-  "readiness",
-  "scores"
-]New value: +[
+  "industry",
+  "revenue_eur",
+  "function",
+  "ai_tier",
+  "readiness"
+]

Previous value: -"BVF scoring modules that fired for this input."New value: +"Scoring-rule and sector-context labels. Sector labels do not certify clinical validation or regulatory compliance."

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Reproducibility record: engine version, the rules that fired, and the resolved inputs. Deterministic, no timestamps. If the verdict is challenged months later, the same inputs on the same engine version reproduce it exactly.",
+  "properties": {
+    "bvf_version": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "engine": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "engine_version": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "inputs_used": {
+      "description": "The resolved inputs the result was computed on, including estimated pillar values.",
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "note": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "rules_fired": {
+      "description": "The rules that actually fired, in order: estimation, gates, classification, value arithmetic.",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -"Citation for the benchmark rates applied."New value: +"Provenance and evidence status for the AI BVF planning rates applied."

Previous value: -"Confidence in the verdict, 0-100."New value: +"Heuristic decision score, 0 to 100, adjusted for input quality. This score has no probability calibration."

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Optional three-question feedback route, present only for Fix/Stop verdicts. The page records the response anonymously only when the user chooses an answer; no assessment data is attached.",
+  "properties": {
+    "question": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "url": {
+      "format": "uri",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "question",
+    "url"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "description": "Meaning and limits of compatibility fields. Present these labels when explaining the result.",
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -"Modelled net value in EUR after capture rate, low/high."New value: +"Readiness-adjusted benefit hypothesis before project build, run and change costs. Replace planning rates with scoped economics before funding."

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Per pillar: \"given\" (caller supplied it) or \"estimated\" (deterministic prior). When any pillar is estimated, tell the user which, and ask for evidence on those to firm up the verdict.",
+  "properties": {
+    "change_enablement": {
+      "enum": [
+        "given",
+        "estimated"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "financial_return": {
+      "enum": [
+        "given",
+        "estimated"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "governance_risk": {
+      "enum": [
+        "given",
+        "estimated"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "strategic_alignment": {
+      "enum": [
+        "given",
+        "estimated"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "The four pillar values the verdict was actually computed on, whether given by the caller or estimated by the engine. Show these to the user when any pillar was estimated.",
+  "properties": {
+    "change_enablement": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "financial_return": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "governance_risk": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "strategic_alignment": {
+      "type": "number"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "What moves this verdict, computed deterministically: the value if readiness were one notch worse, the value at revenue minus 20 percent, and the nearest single-pillar movements that flip the classification. Boards trust ranges with visible assumptions over point estimates; show this.",
+  "properties": {
+    "readiness_one_notch_down": {
+      "description": "Null when readiness is already siloed.",
+      "type": [
+        "object",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "revenue_minus_20pct": {
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "verdict_flips": {
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "The work architecture gate across workflow, roles, human decision rights and performance measures. A stated gap or missing evidence blocks Accelerate.",
+  "properties": {
+    "blocks_accelerate": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "checks": {
+      "items": {
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "gaps": {
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "gate": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "next_question": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "status": {
+      "enum": [
+        "unknown",
+        "partial",
+        "gap",
+        "ready"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "unknowns": {
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "status",
+    "blocks_accelerate",
+    "checks",
+    "gaps",
+    "unknowns",
+    "gate"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -[
-  "bvf_version",
-  "classification",
-  "reason",
-  "net_value_eur",
-  "gross_value_eur",
-  "decision_confidence",
-  "multipliers",
-  "drivers",
-  "benchmark_source",
-  "applied_modules"
-]New value: +[
+  "bvf_version",
+  "classification",
+  "reason",
+  "net_value_eur",
+  "gross_value_eur",
+  "decision_confidence",
+  "multipliers",
+  "drivers",
+  "benchmark_source",
+  "applied_modules",
+  "work_architecture"
+]

Previous value: -"A portfolio document conforming to the AI BVF v1.0 schema: bvf_version, organization (name, industry, optional revenue_eur), and a non-empty initiatives array. Each initiative carries id, name, function, ai_tier, and a scores object whose four pillars each carry a numeric value (0–100). organization.revenue_eur is required to model EUR value; initiatives that cannot be scored (missing revenue, unknown function/ai_tier) appear in skipped_initiatives rather than scored_initiatives. Schema: https://www.aibvf.com/protocol."New value: +"AI BVF v1.0 portfolio with organization and initiatives. Each initiative carries id, name, function, ai_tier and four scores, supplied as numbers or { value, confidence } objects. Retain each initiative's work_architecture, pillar_basis and optional signal_completeness. pillar_basis marks given or estimated values; estimated pillars are recalculated for the current context and retain an input-quality reduction. Supplied values without provenance are caller-provided, with no claim of evidence verification. Accelerate requires the pillar thresholds and all four work-architecture checks. Missing work-design evidence returns Fix for an otherwise green case. organization.revenue_eur is required for benefit modelling. Validate unfamiliar documents first."

Previous value: -"Organisational readiness applied to every initiative in the portfolio. Honest self-assessment: agile = cross-functional, fast decisions; traditional = functional hierarchy; siloed = rigid, hand-off heavy. The portfolio schema does not carry per-initiative readiness; this single value sets the capture rate for the whole portfolio."New value: +"Organisational readiness applied to every initiative in the portfolio. Honest self-assessment: agile = cross-functional, fast decisions; traditional = functional hierarchy; siloed = rigid, hand-off heavy. The portfolio schema does not carry per-initiative readiness; this single value sets the capture rate for the whole portfolio and, paired with the ai_tier of each initiative, its pace-layer drag — lower readiness against a higher tier discounts the modelled EUR value."

Previous value: -"Sum of net EUR value across scored initiatives, low/high."New value: +"Arithmetic sum of benefit hypotheses. Reconcile overlapping scope, double counting and project costs before using this as a portfolio business case."

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Optional three-question feedback route, present only when any initiative was Fix or Stop. The page records the response anonymously only when the user chooses an answer; no assessment data is attached.",
+  "properties": {
+    "question": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "url": {
+      "format": "uri",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "question",
+    "url"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "description": "Meaning and limits of compatibility fields. Present these labels when explaining the result.",
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -"Mean decision confidence across scored initiatives (0–100); 0 when none were scored."New value: +"Mean decision score across scored initiatives (0–100); 0 when none were scored."

Previous value: -"BVF scoring modules that fired for this initiative."New value: +"Scoring-rule and sector-context labels. Sector labels do not certify clinical validation or regulatory compliance."

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Reproducibility record: engine version, the rules that fired, and the resolved inputs. Deterministic, no timestamps. If the verdict is challenged months later, the same inputs on the same engine version reproduce it exactly.",
+  "properties": {
+    "bvf_version": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "engine": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "engine_version": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "inputs_used": {
+      "description": "The resolved inputs the result was computed on, including estimated pillar values.",
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "note": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "rules_fired": {
+      "description": "The rules that actually fired, in order: estimation, gates, classification, value arithmetic.",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Present only when signal_completeness was low: warns the verdict rests on soft inputs and confidence was reduced.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

Previous value: -"Confidence in the verdict (0–100)."New value: +"Heuristic decision score, 0 to 100, adjusted for input quality. This score has no probability calibration."

Previous value: -"Modelled net EUR value, low/high."New value: +"Modelled readiness-adjusted EUR benefit, low/high."

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Per pillar: \"given\" (caller supplied it) or \"estimated\" (deterministic prior). When any pillar is estimated, tell the user which, and ask for evidence on those to firm up the verdict.",
+  "properties": {
+    "change_enablement": {
+      "enum": [
+        "given",
+        "estimated"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "financial_return": {
+      "enum": [
+        "given",
+        "estimated"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "governance_risk": {
+      "enum": [
+        "given",
+        "estimated"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "strategic_alignment": {
+      "enum": [
+        "given",
+        "estimated"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "The four pillar values the verdict was actually computed on, whether given by the caller or estimated by the engine. Show these to the user when any pillar was estimated.",
+  "properties": {
+    "change_enablement": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "financial_return": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "governance_risk": {
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "strategic_alignment": {
+      "type": "number"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "What moves this verdict, computed deterministically: the value if readiness were one notch worse, the value at revenue minus 20 percent, and the nearest single-pillar movements that flip the classification. Boards trust ranges with visible assumptions over point estimates; show this.",
+  "properties": {
+    "readiness_one_notch_down": {
+      "description": "Null when readiness is already siloed.",
+      "type": [
+        "object",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "revenue_minus_20pct": {
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "verdict_flips": {
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Input-quality factor after estimated provenance, pillar quality and any explicit factor are combined conservatively.",
+  "maximum": 1,
+  "minimum": 0,
+  "type": "number"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "The work architecture gate across workflow, roles, human decision rights and performance measures. A stated gap or missing evidence blocks Accelerate.",
+  "properties": {
+    "blocks_accelerate": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "checks": {
+      "items": {
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "gaps": {
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "gate": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "next_question": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "status": {
+      "enum": [
+        "unknown",
+        "partial",
+        "gap",
+        "ready"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "unknowns": {
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "status",
+    "blocks_accelerate",
+    "checks",
+    "gaps",
+    "unknowns",
+    "gate"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -"Scored initiative with the highest mid-point net EUR value. Omitted when none were scored."New value: +"Scored initiative with the highest mid-point readiness-adjusted EUR benefit. Omitted when none were scored."

Previous value: -"Net EUR value range for the top initiative."New value: +"Readiness-adjusted EUR benefit range for the top initiative."

Previous value: -"The portfolio document as a JSON object following the AI BVF v1.0 schema: a top-level object with an \"initiatives\" array, each initiative carrying the same fields score_initiative expects (industry, revenue_eur, function, ai_tier, readiness, and a scores object). Validated structurally; values are not scored here."New value: +"The portfolio document as a JSON object following the AI BVF v1.0 schema: a top-level object with bvf_version, organization, and a non-empty \"initiatives\" array, each initiative carrying the same fields score_initiative expects (industry, revenue_eur, function, ai_tier, readiness, and a scores object with the four 0–100 pillars, each either a bare number or an object { value, confidence? }; both shapes pass). Checked structurally only — required fields present, correct types, enum values valid, pillar numbers in range; the pillar values are NOT scored or judged here (use score_initiative or score_portfolio for that). On failure, errors[] names each failing JSON path and the rule it broke."

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Optional 0–1. How grounded the four pillar scores are in real evidence versus estimated from context. Defaults to 1 (treated as measured). If the organisation lacks formal change-readiness or risk metadata, estimate the pillars from what you know AND set this lower to say so — decision confidence is reduced proportionally and a caveat is attached, instead of returning a falsely confident verdict on soft inputs.",
+  "maximum": 1,
+  "minimum": 0,
+  "type": "number"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Present only when signal_completeness was low: warns the verdict rests on soft inputs and confidence was reduced.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

Previous value: -"Confidence in the verdict if the recommendations land, 0–1."New value: +"Confidence in the verdict if the recommendations land, 0-100."

Previous value: -"Confidence in the verdict, 0–1."New value: +"Confidence in the verdict, 0-100."

Previous value: -"gen1=automation/RPA, gen2=GenAI, gen3=agentic."New value: +"Ambition of the AI being deployed: gen1=automation/RPA, gen2=GenAI, gen3=agentic."

Previous value: -"Optional, for future vertical adjustments."New value: +"Optional; defaults to universal. Reserved for future vertical adjustments."

Previous value: -"Organisational readiness. Honest self-assessment."New value: +"Organisational readiness, honest self-assessment: agile = cross-functional, fast decisions; traditional = functional hierarchy; siloed = rigid, hand-off heavy."

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "properties": {
+    "annual_drag_eur": {
+      "description": "Estimated annual Organisational Drag Cost in EUR, low/high.",
+      "properties": {
+        "high": {
+          "type": "number"
+        },
+        "low": {
+          "type": "number"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "low",
+        "high"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "bvf_version": {
+      "description": "AI BVF protocol version used.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "drag_rate": {
+      "description": "Drag as a fraction of revenue (e.g. 0.02 = 2%), low/high.",
+      "properties": {
+        "high": {
+          "type": "number"
+        },
+        "low": {
+          "type": "number"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "low",
+        "high"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "drivers": {
+      "description": "Named factors contributing to the drag.",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "pace_gap": {
+      "description": "Severity of the tier↔readiness mismatch.",
+      "enum": [
+        "minimal",
+        "moderate",
+        "severe"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "source": {
+      "description": "Citation for the drag-rate model applied.",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "bvf_version",
+    "annual_drag_eur",
+    "drag_rate",
+    "pace_gap",
+    "drivers",
+    "source"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "properties": {
+    "cost_takeout_range": {
+      "description": "Cost take-out as a fraction of revenue, lo/hi.",
+      "properties": {
+        "hi": {
+          "type": "number"
+        },
+        "lo": {
+          "type": "number"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "lo",
+        "hi"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "drivers": {
+      "description": "Named value drivers behind the benchmark.",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "function": {
+      "description": "Business function the rates apply to.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "industry": {
+      "description": "Industry whose multiplier was applied.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "industry_multiplier": {
+      "description": "Multiplier applied to the base rates for this industry.",
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "revenue_uplift_range": {
+      "description": "Revenue uplift as a fraction of revenue, lo/hi.",
+      "properties": {
+        "hi": {
+          "type": "number"
+        },
+        "lo": {
+          "type": "number"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "lo",
+        "hi"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "source": {
+      "description": "Citation for the benchmark figures.",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "function",
+    "industry",
+    "revenue_uplift_range",
+    "cost_takeout_range",
+    "industry_multiplier",
+    "drivers",
+    "source"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "properties": {
+    "ai_tiers": {
+      "description": "All accepted ai_tier values (gen1/gen2/gen3).",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "bvf_version": {
+      "description": "AI BVF protocol version these enums belong to.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "functions": {
+      "description": "All accepted business-function values.",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "industries": {
+      "description": "All accepted industry values.",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "readiness": {
+      "description": "All accepted organisational-readiness values.",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "bvf_version",
+    "industries",
+    "functions",
+    "ai_tiers",
+    "readiness"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "properties": {
+    "advisory_next_step": {
+      "description": "Optional CTA, present only for Fix/Stop verdicts.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "bvf_version": {
+      "description": "AI BVF protocol version used.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "current_classification": {
+      "description": "Verdict as the initiative stands today.",
+      "enum": [
+        "Accelerate",
+        "Fix",
+        "Stop"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "feasible": {
+      "description": "Whether the target is reachable via the listed pillar moves.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "notes": {
+      "description": "Caveats or context on the recommendation set.",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "projected_decision_confidence": {
+      "description": "Confidence in the verdict if the recommendations land, 0–1.",
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "recommendations": {
+      "description": "Per-pillar improvement actions.",
+      "items": {
+        "properties": {
+          "action": {
+            "description": "Concrete action to close the gap.",
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "current": {
+            "description": "Current pillar score (0–100).",
+            "type": "number"
+          },
+          "delta": {
+            "description": "Points of improvement required (target − current).",
+            "type": "number"
+          },
+          "pillar": {
+            "enum": [
+              "strategic_alignment",
+              "financial_return",
+              "change_enablement",
+              "governance_risk"
+            ],
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "rationale": {
+            "description": "Why this action moves the pillar.",
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "target": {
+            "description": "Pillar score needed to flip classification (0–100).",
+            "type": "number"
+          }
+        },
+        "required": [
+          "pillar",
+          "current",
+          "target",
+          "delta",
+          "action",
+          "rationale"
+        ],
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "target_classification": {
+      "description": "Verdict the recommendations aim to reach.",
+      "enum": [
+        "Accelerate",
+        "Fix",
+        "Stop"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "bvf_version",
+    "current_classification",
+    "target_classification",
+    "feasible",
+    "recommendations",
+    "projected_decision_confidence",
+    "notes"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "properties": {
+    "advisory_next_step": {
+      "description": "Optional CTA, present only for Fix/Stop verdicts.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "applied_modules": {
+      "description": "BVF scoring modules that fired for this input.",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "benchmark_source": {
+      "description": "Citation for the benchmark rates applied.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "bvf_version": {
+      "description": "AI BVF protocol version used.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "classification": {
+      "description": "The verdict for this initiative.",
+      "enum": [
+        "Accelerate",
+        "Fix",
+        "Stop"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "decision_confidence": {
+      "description": "Confidence in the verdict, 0–1.",
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "drivers": {
+      "description": "Named value drivers behind the estimate.",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "gross_value_eur": {
+      "description": "Modelled gross value in EUR before capture, low/high.",
+      "properties": {
+        "high": {
+          "type": "number"
+        },
+        "low": {
+          "type": "number"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "low",
+        "high"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "multipliers": {
+      "description": "Factors applied to the base rates.",
+      "properties": {
+        "capture_high": {
+          "type": "number"
+        },
+        "capture_low": {
+          "type": "number"
+        },
+        "industry": {
+          "type": "number"
+        },
+        "tier": {
+          "type": "number"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "industry",
+        "tier",
+        "capture_low",
+        "capture_high"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "net_value_eur": {
+      "description": "Modelled net value in EUR after capture rate, low/high.",
+      "properties": {
+        "high": {
+          "type": "number"
+        },
+        "low": {
+          "type": "number"
+        }
+      },
+      "required": [
+        "low",
+        "high"
+      ],
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "reason": {
+      "description": "One-line justification for the classification.",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "bvf_version",
+    "classification",
+    "reason",
+    "net_value_eur",
+    "gross_value_eur",
+    "decision_confidence",
+    "multipliers",
+    "drivers",
+    "benchmark_source",
+    "applied_modules"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "properties": {
+    "bvf_version": {
+      "description": "AI BVF protocol version validated against.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "errors": {
+      "description": "Empty when valid; otherwise one entry per schema violation.",
+      "items": {
+        "properties": {
+          "msg": {
+            "description": "The rule that was broken.",
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "path": {
+            "description": "JSON path to the failing field.",
+            "type": "string"
+          }
+        },
+        "required": [
+          "path",
+          "msg"
+        ],
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "valid": {
+      "description": "True when the portfolio conforms to the schema.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "bvf_version",
+    "valid",
+    "errors"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}