Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to aibvf-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to scout, rank, and preflight software work before implementation, returning evidence-backed ACT, VERIFY, or SKIP decisions for issues and pull requests.
      60 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables typed decisions (yes/no, choice, score) with transparent preflight checks, honest confidence reporting, and health monitoring.
      510 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A pre-action risk gate for AI agents. Your agent calls the forecast tool before any irreversible action — send email, run SQL, make a payment, delete a file — and gets a risk score (0–100) and a GO / CONFIRM / STOP verdict in a few seconds.
      1
      82 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with personalized timing intelligence by scoring decisions (0-100) against a user's energy profile and the Five Elements framework, enabling optimal scheduling for actions like trip planning, product launches, and meetings.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Turns an unstructured business note into deterministic, explainable signals for revenue, automation, risk, urgency, and data, returning a score, priority, evidence, and a suggested next action. This lets an AI assistant assess and prioritize business opportunities through an auditable, locally computed tool.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an AI agent to turn an uncertain routing decision into a confidence-scored choice among explicit routes, with a thresholded recommendation to proceed, review deeper, or ask for human input, while remaining advisory-only.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct action: scoring a single initiative, scoring a portfolio, validating a portfolio, recommending improvements, diagnosing a process, calculating drag cost, looking up benchmarks, and listing taxonomy values. The two potentially similar tools, score_initiative and diagnose_process, are explicitly differentiated as proposed-initiative versus existing-process counterparts, so an agent can select correctly.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent lower_snake_case verb_noun pattern: score_initiative, score_portfolio, validate_portfolio, diagnose_process, get_benchmark, list_taxonomy. The only longer name, calculate_pace_layer_drag, still follows the same verb_object convention and is not jarring.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well within the ideal range and each tool earns its place in the workflow. The set covers core scoring, portfolio handling, recommendations, benchmark/taxonomy lookups, and operational diagnosis without unnecessary duplication or bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full analysis lifecycle: taxonomy discovery, benchmarking, single-initiative scoring, portfolio validation and scoring, improvement recommendations, and process diagnosis. There are no obvious dead ends—each scoring path has a supporting tool for inputs, validation, or next actions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week