Extra Network Details (batch)

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, and the description provides no information about side effects, permissions, rate limits, or pagination limits. The word 'fetch' suggests a read-only operation, but this is not explicitly stated, leaving behavior largely unspecified.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that conveys the core function without redundant details. It is well-structured and free of unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is too brief to cover the tool's complexity: it does not explain what 'full details' includes, how pagination parameters interact, or what the response format is. Without an output schema, essential return information is missing, making the tool under-documented.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not explain any of the eight parameters (hash, name, page, limit, title, offset, filename, fullname). With zero schema descriptions, the description must compensate, but it remains silent on parameter meaning, making usage ambiguous.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool fetches full details for extra network items in batch mode with pagination. It distinguishes itself from singular detail or list tools through the explicit 'batch-fetch' verb.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The term 'batch-fetch' implies this tool should be used when multiple items are needed at once, but no explicit guidance on when to prefer it over alternatives (e.g., individual detail calls) is provided. The usage scenario is only implied, not directly stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.