Add Bookmark

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Bookmark a CivitAI model name' and lists the endpoint, but does not indicate side effects, idempotency, duplicate handling, authentication needs, or return values. For a state-changing POST operation, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single clear sentence that front-loads the action and includes the endpoint in parentheses. There is no redundant content, filler, or repetition; every part contributes to identifying the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description covers the basic action and endpoint, but it omits behavioral context such as what happens on success, whether duplicate bookmarks are rejected, or if there are side effects. The missing return-value and mutation details make it adequate but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameter 'name' is already documented as 'Model name to bookmark'. The description adds only the 'CivitAI' context, which is marginal. It does not provide additional format, examples, or edge-case guidance beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a precise action and resource: 'Bookmark a CivitAI model name'. It also includes the exact endpoint (POST /sdapi/v2/civitai/bookmarks), which unambiguously differentiates it from sibling tools like sdnext_civitai_remove_bookmark and sdnext_civitai_bookmarks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or alternative guidance is provided. The tool name and sibling names imply it is for adding bookmarks, but the description does not state that this is for creating a bookmark versus removing or listing them, nor does it mention any prerequisites or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.