Skip to main content
Glama
ComplianceCow

ComplianceCow MCP Server

verify_control_automation

Check automation status of compliance controls by verifying rule ID presence and retrieve rule details to confirm automated implementation.

Instructions

Verify if a control is automated or not based on the presence of ruleId. If ruleId exists, fetch and return basic rule information.

Args: control_id: The ID of the control to verify

Returns: Dictionary containing automation status and rule details if automated

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
control_idYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses conditional behavior (fetches rule info only if ruleId exists) but lacks details on error handling, what 'basic rule information' entails, or side effects given no annotations exist.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Appropriately concise with clear Args/Returns structure; front-loaded with main purpose before parameter details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Sufficient for a single-parameter tool; acknowledges output schema exists by providing high-level return description rather than detailed field enumeration.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Effectively compensates for 0% schema description coverage by defining control_id as 'The ID of the control to verify', clarifying the parameter's purpose.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States specific purpose (verify automation status via ruleId presence) and distinguishes from siblings by focusing on status verification rather than rule management or attachment.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this versus alternatives like fetch_cc_rule_by_id or attach_rule_to_control; lacks explicit when-not conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ComplianceCow/cow-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server