Get Db Schema

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations include readOnlyHint: true and destructiveHint: false, which align with the non-destructive 'list' operation. The description itself is consistent with these annotations and does not add misleading context. It could mention that no modifications occur, but the annotations already cover this.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that directly conveys the tool's purpose. There is no redundant or extraneous information, making it easy for an agent to quickly grasp the function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple listing operation, the description is adequate. It does not mention output format or pagination, but the absence of an output schema reduces the need for such details. However, it could clarify whether the 'schema' parameter acts as a filter, which would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema defines six parameters without any descriptions, and the description does not explain their meaning or usage. While names like workspaceSlug and appSlug are somewhat self-explanatory, parameters such as 'schema' and 'component' are ambiguous in context. Since schema description coverage is 0%, the description fails to compensate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: listing a database component's schemas and tables. It uses the specific verb 'list' and identifies the resource (database component). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like runDbQuery or getDbCredentials.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly mention when to use this tool versus alternatives such as runDbQuery or getDbCredentials. However, the read-only listing nature is implied by the verb 'list', but no direct comparison or conditional guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.