Create Workspace

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate destructiveHint=true, which is unusual for a creation operation and is not explained. The description only mentions the scope requirement, omitting any details about side effects, return values, or consequences. The lack of behavioral disclosure is a significant gap, and the destructive annotation appears contradictory to the 'create' semantics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It is highly concise, though the brevity borders on under-specification. For the dimension of conciseness, it earns high marks, but the lack of content is penalized in other dimensions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (nested object with multiple required fields, no output schema, and annotations that are not fully explanatory), the description is grossly incomplete. It omits expected behavior, parameter semantics, and any guidance on response or errors. The sole mention of scope requirement is insufficient for safe usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter, requestBody, has a description of 'The JSON request body.' which adds no meaning beyond the schema. The nested fields (name, slug, hues, tier, etc.) lack semantic explanations; the description does not clarify what these fields represent or how they should be filled. Schema coverage is technically 100% but the description is tautological.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb and resource: 'Create a workspace'. It distinguishes from siblings like updateWorkspace and deleteWorkspace by the action, though it does not explicitly contrast them. The scope requirement is an extra but not a differentiator. Overall, the purpose is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides only the prerequisite 'requires full scope' but gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like updateWorkspace. There is no mention of exclusions, preconditions beyond scope, or typical use cases. The agent must infer that creation is for new workspaces from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.