Skip to main content
Glama

Ga4.Admin.List Data Streams

ga4.admin.list_data_streams

List all data streams under a specified GA4 property to identify and manage analytics data sources.

Instructions

List data streams under a GA4 property.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
property_idYes

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.5.0

TDQS

C2.8/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full disclosure burden, yet it says nothing about read-only semantics, permission requirements, pagination, or result limits. Output schema existence helps with return shape, but the behavioral profile of the call is essentially undocumented.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with zero filler; nothing is redundant. It is efficient but so terse that structure beyond one clause is absent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a simple one-parameter list tool with an output schema, so the bar is modest, but the missing property_id format and any note on pagination/read-only behavior leave gaps an agent could stumble on. Adequate but with clear gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for the single parameter, so the description must compensate and does not. 'Under a GA4 property' loosely implies property_id, but no expected format (e.g., bare numeric ID vs 'properties/123456') is given, which is the main ambiguity for this API.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('List') and resource ('data streams') scoped to a GA4 property, which cleanly separates it from ga4.admin.list_properties and ga4.admin.list_key_events. It does not explicitly name a sibling to route against, so it falls just short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites (e.g., needing a property ID from list_properties first), and no exclusions. The only implied usage is that a property must exist, which is left entirely to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools