Trust Gate MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Trust Gate MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to sign decisions with post-quantum cryptographic proofs and maintain secure audit trails for compliance. It provides tools for stamping events, verifying chain integrity, and exporting audit data across industries like finance and healthcare.430 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides cryptographic governance receipts for AI agents, enabling pre-execution evaluation and signed verdicts (EXECUTE/BLOCK/REVIEW/SHADOW) with offline-verifiable audit trails.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceTamper-evident cryptographic audit trail for LLM outputs. Compliance logging for AI agent decisions.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides tools to issue, verify, and export cryptographically signed receipts for AI agent actions, enabling tamper-proof audit trails for compliance with regulations like the EU AI Act.465 npm1MIT

evermint-mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceTamper-evident receipts for AI agent actions. The notary layer for agent-to-agent transactions.23 npm1MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceIssue and verify signed receipts for agent actions, enabling durable, independently checkable proof of policy decisions. Supports offline verification via get_keyset and verify_receipt tools without an account.0Inno Setup
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Multiple tools mint or return receipts (mint_receipt_for_record_change, mint_action_receipt, gate_decision, check_egress, run_exit_drill), creating potential confusion about which to use. The descriptions differentiate primary purposes, but mint_receipt_for_record_change and mint_action_receipt have clear overlap for record-change actions.
All tool names are snake_case with a verb-first pattern (mint, verify, gate, check, run). One outlier, 'audit_my_agent_inventory', uses a possessive 'my', and 'gate_decision' could be read as a noun, but overall the naming is predictable.
Seven tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range, and each tool covers a distinct operational aspect of the Trust Gate workflow without feeling redundant or excessive.
The set covers receipt minting (two variants), verification, decision gating, egress classification, agent inventory auditing, and exit drills. Minor gaps include no tool for managing trust configurations or revocation, but core workflows are covered.