wow_inventory_valuation

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries full burden. It mentions 'real-time' and returns output types, but does not disclose behavioral traits like authentication needs, rate limits, side effects, or data freshness. It is adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences front-loading action and output. No fluff. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 6 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description covers core function and outputs but omits prerequisites (e.g., character must exist), data source reliability, or how valuation_method affects results. Adequate but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 33% (only realm and character have descriptions). The description adds meaning for include_bank and include_reagents via 'bags, bank, and reagent bank', but does not explain include_void_storage or valuation_method. It partially compensates for low schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: get real-time valuation of a character's bags, bank, and reagent bank. It specifies outputs: total net worth, item breakdown, and liquidation recommendations. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like auction search or crafting profit analyzer.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for inventory valuation but provides no explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives (e.g., auction search for market prices) or when not to use. No exclusions or context are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.