wow_auction_search

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility. It includes COAI certification indicating read-only, no automated actions, but lacks details on data freshness, pagination, or rate limits. This is adequate but not exhaustive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences. The first sentence captures the core functionality, and the second adds the COAI certification. No unnecessary words, and the key information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema, the description explains return fields (buyout prices, quantity, time remaining) and required parameter (realm). It covers the main aspects of a search tool, though it could detail the return structure more precisely.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the description adds minimal extra meaning beyond the schema. It restates the filtering options but does not elaborate on parameter usage or edge cases, resulting in a baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches the WoW auction house for items by name, category, or price range on a specific realm, distinguishing it from sibling tools like wow_price_history or wow_cross_realm_arbitrage. The verb 'search' and resource 'auction house' are specific, and the scope of filtering is defined.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for searching current auction listings but does not explicitly guide when to use this tool versus alternatives like wow_market_snapshot or wow_price_history. No when-not-to-use or exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.