Get Schema
schemaReturn a bundled JSON Schema for specified digital passport data model components, enabling validation and structured processing.
Instructions
Return one bundled JSON Schema.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes |
schemaReturn a bundled JSON Schema for specified digital passport data model components, enabling validation and structured processing.
Return one bundled JSON Schema.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description only states the basic function. It does not disclose error behavior, authentication needs, or read-only nature. For a tool with no annotations, this is insufficient transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is one short sentence, which is concise, but it sacrifices necessary detail. It is appropriately front-loaded but incomplete.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given one parameter with nine enum values and no output schema or annotations, the description is too brief. It does not explain what each name returns or the format of the JSON Schema. The tool is not fully documented.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description does not mention the 'name' parameter at all, despite it being required with an enum. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Return one bundled JSON Schema.' clearly states the verb (Return) and resource (bundled JSON Schema). However, 'bundled' is ambiguous, and it does not explicitly connect to the parameter 'name' which selects which schema. It distinguishes from sibling tools that perform different operations.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Sibling tools like coverage, compare, etc., are not mentioned. No context on prerequisites or conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/CE-RISE-software/dp-assessment-workbench'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server