io.github.CE-RISE-software/dpawb
OfficialServer Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| assessC | Assess one composition profile and return one assessment_result document. |
| coverageA | Assess one use case against one composition profile and return one coverage_result document. |
| compareB | Compare exactly two assessment_result documents and optionally apply an analyst-authored alignment file. |
| prioritizeB | Rank improvement targets from one assessment_result document plus optional downstream result documents. |
| recommend_compositionB | Recommend a deterministic combined composition from two assessment results. |
| schemaC | Return one bundled JSON Schema. |
| vocabularyC | Return one bundled controlled vocabulary document. |
| templateC | Return one bundled YAML template document. |
| capabilitiesA | Return the deterministic command and artifact capability catalog. |
| summarizeA | Create one deterministic summary_result document from one or more existing result JSON documents. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but coverage and assess could be confused as they both produce assessment-related results; however, their inputs differ (use case vs composition profile). Overall clear.
Tool names are a mix of verbs (compare, prioritize, assess) and nouns (coverage, schema, vocabulary), with one snake_case verb_noun (recommend_composition). No consistent pattern.
10 tools is appropriate for a specialized assessment toolkit; not too many or too few.
Missing basic CRUD for profiles or results (e.g., no get_result, delete_result), but the core assessment workflow (assess, compare, prioritize, recommend, summarize) is covered. Minor gaps.