Skip to main content
Glama
CE-RISE-software

io.github.CE-RISE-software/dpawb

Official
by CE-RISE-software
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to io.github.CE-RISE-software/dpawb

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • passwerk

      ShahriarBijoy
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to turn messy supplier documents into a conformant Digital Battery Passport in the official AAS format (IDTA 02035), plus a legally cited gap report, with all core processing running offline and no API keys required.
      Apache 2.0

    • io.github.Medxpert-org/ubic

      Medxpert-org
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and builders to run local, audit-traceable governance assessments, including an A³ scorecard, ISO/IEC 42001 and NIST evidence templates, compliance checklists, passport lookup, and sensitive-text screening.
      MIT

    • io.github.presidio-v/presidio

      presidio-v
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables assessment of AI use cases against the IKI-Gov reference model, scoring maturity across six measurement dimensions, checking readiness of lifecycle quality gates, and mapping coverage against ISO/IEC 42001, the EU AI Act, and NIST AI RMF. Supports scriptable CLI and JSON output, persisted portfolios with trend tracking, and Markdown or JSON report export.
      91 PyPI
      5
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but coverage and assess could be confused as they both produce assessment-related results; however, their inputs differ (use case vs composition profile). Overall clear.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Tool names are a mix of verbs (compare, prioritize, assess) and nouns (coverage, schema, vocabulary), with one snake_case verb_noun (recommend_composition). No consistent pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    10 tools is appropriate for a specialized assessment toolkit; not too many or too few.

    Completeness3/5

    Missing basic CRUD for profiles or results (e.g., no get_result, delete_result), but the core assessment workflow (assess, compare, prioritize, recommend, summarize) is covered. Minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources