Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
wisp-mcp

wisp-mcp

by BreezeDelegate
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to wisp-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • anthropic_skill

      williamchek
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A robust, lightweight Model Context Protocol (MCP) server designed to empower your AI Agents with context-awareness, safe execution sandboxes, and dedicated thought logs.
      ISC

    • RL-MCP

      rlefko
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides AI models with structured access to external data and services, acting as a bridge between AI assistants and applications, databases, and APIs in a standardized, secure way.
      2
      -

    • MCP Toolkit

      zxfgds
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive Model Context Protocol server implementation that enables AI assistants to interact with file systems, databases, GitHub repositories, web resources, and system tools while maintaining security and control.
      102 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Claude Code, inside the Godot 4 editorFlockbay puts an AI agent in the real Godot 4 editor: it writes GDScript, runs your game and fixes what breaks. Free, or bring your own Claude Code or Codex.flockbay.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 35 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources and actions, and descriptions clarify the intended use. The main overlap is among file-reading tools (read_file, read_file_chunk, find_in_file, file_fingerprint) and write variants (write_file, safe_write_file, replace_in_file), but these are differentiated by context and safety requirements.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set predominantly follows a snake_case action-prefix convention such as list_servers, read_file, create_backup, and delete_database. Minor deviations appear in noun-style tools like capabilities, server_details, server_status, audit_logs, file_fingerprint, power, and backup_download, but the casing remains consistent and readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    The 35 tools cover several substantial subdomains: servers, files, backups, databases, console/power, and settings. This breadth makes the count defensible, but it is still heavy and may overwhelm agents selecting among many related file and backup operations.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad across server inspection, power/console control, filesystem operations, backups, databases, and settings. Gaps remain for possible panel operations such as scheduled tasks, user/subuser management, allocation management, startup variable editing, or explicit file upload/download, but core lifecycle workflows are well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessSyncing

    Resources