stop_timer
Stop the active running timer and save it as a time entry to record your work session.
Instructions
Stop the active running timer and save it as a time entry
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Stop the active running timer and save it as a time entry to record your work session.
Stop the active running timer and save it as a time entry
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must carry the burden. It does not disclose behavior if no active timer exists, side effects, return value, or irreversibility. The description only states the basic action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single, front-loaded sentence with no unnecessary words. Every part contributes meaning.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with no parameters or output schema, the description covers the basic purpose but lacks behavioral details (error handling, prerequisites). Adequate but could be more informative.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter information, which is acceptable. Baseline for 0 params is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('stop') and the resource ('active running timer') and the result ('save it as a time entry'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'start_timer' and 'log_time'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool, prerequisites (e.g., a timer must be running), or when not to use. No comparison with alternatives like 'log_time' or 'get_active_timer'.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Blueneon-Tech-Pvt-Ltd/task-mesh-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server