start_timer
Start a stopwatch timer on a specific issue to track time spent.
Instructions
Start a running stopwatch timer on a specific issue
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| issueId | Yes | Issue UUID |
Start a stopwatch timer on a specific issue to track time spent.
Start a running stopwatch timer on a specific issue
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| issueId | Yes | Issue UUID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must carry the full burden. It does not disclose side effects, requirements (e.g., whether issue must exist), or what happens if a timer is already running.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no fluff, front-loaded with key action. Efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-param mutation tool, the description is adequate but missing details like timer overwrite behavior or issue state requirements. Not fully complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3. Description adds little beyond the schema: it confirms the timer is on a specific issue, but no new semantics for the issueId parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool starts a running stopwatch timer on a specific issue, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like stop_timer and get_active_timer.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., log_time, stop_timer). Missing context about prerequisites or conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Blueneon-Tech-Pvt-Ltd/task-mesh-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server