create_music_video_grade

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description should disclose effects like whether the grade is applied destructively, requires a specific clip context, or modifies the timeline. It only says 'apply' without any behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but not efficiently informative. It lacks structure and fails to justify its existence beyond a single vague verb phrase.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 3 parameters, zero schema coverage, no annotations, and an output schema that isn't described, the description is grossly incomplete. It provides no context for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the description does not explain any of the three parameters (grade_mode, item_index, track_index). The agent must guess their meaning and constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Apply registered music-video DRX' is vague and conflicts with the tool name 'create_music_video_grade' which implies creation, not application. It doesn't clarify what 'registered' means or how this differs from similar sibling tools like apply_grade or create_commercial_grade.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus siblings. Agents have no basis to choose this over apply_grade, copy_grade, or other create_*_grade tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.