batch_grade_clips

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only says 'apply', implying mutation, but fails to disclose whether the operation overwrites existing grades, is additive, or destructive. No annotations exist, so the description should carry the burden of behavioral disclosure, which it does not.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, concise but lacking necessary detail. It could be expanded without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of batch grading, 3 parameters (two required), no annotations, and a partial output schema (existence indicated but not shown), the description is insufficient. It does not mention return values, side effects, or preconditions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, meaning no descriptions exist for parameters. The description adds no explanation for 'clips' (array of objects with additionalProperties integer), 'template' (string), or 'grade_mode' (integer with default 0). Without explanation, the agent cannot correctly construct inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (apply) and the specific resource (registered DRX template to explicit timeline clip addresses). It distinguishes from sibling tools like apply_grade which likely applies to a single clip, and copy_grade which copies grades between clips.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., apply_grade, copy_grade). The description lacks context for prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.