apply_grade

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It mentions three modes but does not explain whether the operation is destructive, overwrites existing grades, requires permissions, or what the outcome is. The presence of an output schema is not leveraged.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (two sentences), which is concise but at the expense of essential information. Not all sentences are valuable—it lacks parameter details and behavioral context. Could be more structured with parameter mappings.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (4 parameters, no annotations, output schema exists), the description is inadequate. It does not explain the tool's return value, side effects, or how the parameters interact. Falls short of providing a complete understanding for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%; the description adds almost no parameter meaning. It only hints at 'grade_mode' via mode enumeration but does not explain 'drx_path', 'track_index', or 'item_index'. Fails to compensate for missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Apply a DRX grade to a clip' with specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'create_cinematic_grade' by focusing on applying an existing grade. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from other apply-like siblings such as 'load_powergrade'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'load_powergrade' or grading creation tools. The description implies usage for applying DRX grades but does not exclude other contexts or provide prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.