oci_kafka_list_cluster_config_versions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Mentions that configurations are versioned and each update creates a new version. Does not mention pagination, ordering, or limits. Adequate but could elaborate on behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: five sentences, no redundant information. Front-loaded with purpose, followed by versioning context, usage guidance, and parameter details. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, usage, and parameter. With an output schema present, return values are defined. Does not mention if results are paginated or sorted, but overall adequate for a list operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Single parameter cluster_config_id is described with its OCID format (ocid1.kafkaclusterconfig.*), adding significant value beyond the schema's title. Since schema description coverage is 0%, description fully compensates.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool lists all versions of a Kafka cluster configuration. Explains that configurations are versioned, distinguishing this from retrieving a single version or listing configurations. Verb 'list' is appropriate, and resource is specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly describes the use case: to view version history and choose a version to apply or roll back to. Implicitly differentiates from siblings like get_cluster_config_version (for a single version). Lacks explicit exclusions but provides strong context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.