oci_kafka_get_cluster_config_version

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states it retrieves a version but does not mention safety (read-only), idempotency, permission requirements, or behavior on missing versions. This is insufficient for a tool with no annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two sentences plus an argument list. It is front-loaded with the main action and includes only necessary details. Every part earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has an output schema (not shown) which reduces the need to explain return values. However, the description lacks prerequisites or error context. For a simple read operation, it is fairly complete but could mention that the config version must exist.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description adds meaningful context: for 'cluster_config_id' it specifies the OCID format (ocid1.kafkaclusterconfig.*), and for 'version_number' it clarifies it is an integer version. This adds substantial value beyond the schema titles.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Get' and the specific resource 'a specific version of an OCI Kafka cluster configuration'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get_cluster_config' and 'list_cluster_config_versions' by specifying retrieval by version number.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving a specific version but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives such as 'list_cluster_config_versions' or 'get_cluster_config'. No when-not or exclusion criteria are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.