oci_kafka_create_cluster_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions the --allow-writes requirement and the lifecycle step (apply via update_cluster), but does not elaborate on other behavioral aspects such as idempotency, rate limits, or error conditions. This is adequate but not detailed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and well-structured: it opens with the core purpose, mentions a key requirement, explains the lifecycle, and then lists parameters. Every sentence adds value without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 3 parameters, 0% schema coverage, no annotations, and an output schema (not shown), the description sufficiently covers the tool's purpose, prerequisite, and usage. It lacks detailed return value info but that is expected with an output schema. Overall, it's complete for this create action.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must add meaning. It lists all three parameters (display_name, compartment_id, freeform_tags) with brief, clear explanations that go beyond the schema's basic titles and types. This is helpful, though the description could be more detailed for tags or compartment_id.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a new OCI Kafka cluster configuration, defined as a named, versioned container for Kafka broker settings. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like oci_kafka_update_cluster_config and oci_kafka_create_cluster.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description specifies the prerequisite 'Requires --allow-writes' and advises using oci_kafka_update_cluster after creation to apply the config. It gives clear usage context but does not explicitly state when not to use this tool. Overall, it provides good guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.