get_flow
Retrieve your personal Deezer Flow, an auto-generated mix based on your listening habits.
Instructions
Get your personal Deezer Flow (auto-generated mix).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve your personal Deezer Flow, an auto-generated mix based on your listening habits.
Get your personal Deezer Flow (auto-generated mix).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description carries full burden. 'Get' implies a read-only operation, but no explicit confirmation of non-destructiveness, rate limits, or side effects. The description is adequate but lacks detail beyond the basic retrieval nature.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence with no extraneous words. It efficiently conveys the tool's purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a parameterless retrieval tool with no output schema, the description is sufficient. It explains what the tool returns (personal Deezer Flow). However, it could mention authentication or that it returns the current mix without modifying state.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter information, which is acceptable as none exist. Baseline 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves the user's personal Deezer Flow, an auto-generated mix. The verb 'Get' and resource 'Deezer Flow' are specific, distinguishing it from siblings like get_album or get_playlist.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites (e.g., authentication required). The description simply states what it does without context of appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Benitoow/mcp-deezer'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server