add_artist_to_favorite
Add an artist to your favorites by providing their artist ID.
Instructions
Follow an artist.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| artist_id | Yes |
Add an artist to your favorites by providing their artist ID.
Follow an artist.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| artist_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as idempotency, authentication requirements, or side effects. The description carries full burden but fails to provide any.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is only two words, which is under-specified rather than concise. It fails to provide necessary information in a brief manner.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite the tool's simplicity, the description omits important context like return values, prerequisites, and whether the action is reversible. It is minimally adequate but has significant gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% for the single parameter 'artist_id'. The description does not add any meaning, such as format, source, or example values, leaving the agent without needed context.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Follow an artist' states a verb and resource, but 'follow' may not exactly match the tool name 'add to favorite'. It is clear enough but does not differentiate from siblings like 'add_album_to_favorite'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'remove_artist_from_favorite' or other favorite tools. The description lacks any context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Benitoow/mcp-deezer'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server