get_favorite_albums
Retrieve your favorite albums from Deezer. Optionally limit the number of results (default 50).
Instructions
Your favorite albums.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| first | No |
Retrieve your favorite albums from Deezer. Optionally limit the number of results (default 50).
Your favorite albums.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| first | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations and a minimal description, no behavioral traits are disclosed (e.g., read-only, pagination, rate limits). The description fails to inform the agent beyond the tool name.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise (4 words) but at the expense of missing essential information. It is not appropriately sized for a tool that needs explanation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite low complexity, the description is too incomplete. It does not clarify that the tool retrieves a list of favorite albums or mention the optional pagination parameter.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description does not explain the single 'first' parameter. No added meaning beyond the schema's type and default.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description is 'Your favorite albums.' – a noun phrase that merely restates the tool name without providing a verb or distinguishing from similar siblings like get_favorite_tracks.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_favorite_tracks). The description gives no context for usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Benitoow/mcp-deezer'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server