aziel-runtime

Drop QNM rollup presence

mesh_leave

DestructiveIdempotent

Remove one node from the QNM rollup so it no longer appears in counts. Requires node_id plus confirm=true to run, or dry_run=true to preview.

Instructions

Drop one node from the QNM rollup (POST /v1/mesh/leave) — not a suite-wide radio off. Use this when a previously joined node should leave the counts. Do not use it for turning suite-presence off or listing nodes; use mesh_nodes or mesh_status instead. Destructive to that node's presence only. Always allowed. No implicit heal. Repeating a missing node_id is a no-op/refuse, not resurrection. node_id is required. Mutation requires confirm=true (runtime gate) or dry_run=true (preview only, no write). confirm and dry_run stay optional on inputSchema.required. dry_run still returns FG-HALLUC-TOOL, FG-STUB, FG-UNKNOWN-OP, or FG-LOCAL-ONLY when a confirm call would refuse. confirm is consent, not tenant auth, and it does not upgrade shared public-demo isolation. Returns leave receipt for the node_id.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`confirm`	No	Documented confirmation flag. Optional in inputSchema.required (connector refresh must not break). tools/call still refuses MCP-CONFIRM-REQUIRED when confirm is missing or false unless dry_run=true. confirm is consent to run the call. It is not tenant auth and it does not upgrade shared public-demo isolation.
`dry_run`	No	Optional preview flag. When true, do not write and do not stamp a ledger tip. Allowlist, hallucination, stub, and local-only checks still run and return the same FragGate refuse code a confirm call would get. MCP-DRY-RUN is returned only when that call would have been allowed to proceed. confirm is consent, not tenant auth, and it does not upgrade shared public-demo isolation.
`node_id`	Yes	Required node id to drop from the rollup.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`code`	No	FragGate or fabric code when present: FG-OK, FG-HALLUC-TOOL, FG-STUB, FG-LOCAL-ONLY, FG-UNKNOWN-OP, FG-GATE-REFUSE, FG-LAMB-REFUSE, or a module refuse such as MESH-* / AKM-*.
`door`	No	Door name. The public door is fraggate.
`ran_in`	No	Execution locale (for example aziel-runtime) when present.
`result`	No	FragGate body: ok, code, door, slug, op, engine_digest, ran_in, provenance, refusal, limitations, receipt, plus the engine result. Unknown names refuse FG-HALLUC-TOOL; stubs refuse FG-STUB.
`status`	No	HTTP-like status when present on wrappers (200 ok; 400+ error / refuse).
`display`	No	Human-facing envelope. Show display.action, title, and summary, then take the next input. Never echo raw tool names.
`receipt`	No	Optional receipt, ledger tip, or TemporalLock/ForgeReceipts exit when the door stamped one.
`refusal`	No	Explicit refuse object, code, or message when the door or engine refused.
`engine_op`	No	Resolved engine op when present (often inside result).
`ledger_tip`	No	Ask/refuse ledger tip when the door stamped one.
`provenance`	No	Provenance / input packet when the pipeline attached one.
`session_id`	No	Raw session id when session plumbing was used. Hidden unless the user asked for the chain.
`engine_slug`	No	Resolved engine slug when present (often inside result).
`limitations`	No	Capability limitations or Remain-OFF notes when present.
`engine_digest`	No	64-hex engine_digest when a true in-process engine ran (often inside result).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed5 schema fields changedv2.0.9Sep 29, 2026

changedOutput schema / description

Previous value: -"Display envelope shown to the user (display.title / display.summary) plus the machine result. Extra engine fields may appear."New value: +"Display envelope shown to the user (display.action / display.title / display.summary) plus the machine result. Extra engine fields may appear. Do not echo raw tool names."

changedOutput schema / properties / display / description

Previous value: -"Human-facing envelope. Show title and summary, then take the next input."New value: +"Human-facing envelope. Show display.action, title, and summary, then take the next input. Never echo raw tool names."

addedOutput schema / properties / display / properties / action

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Human-visible run frame. Always \"Run aziel runtime\". Product verb titles stay on title. Not a tool name.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / display / properties / image

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "description": "Present only when a real production included png_b64, jpeg_b64 (or the same byte family), or a cited http(s) image URL. No invented thumbs. Omitted on dry_run. reviewed is true only when executed production bytes are attached; a dry_run never mints reviewed.",
+  "properties": {
+    "data": {
+      "description": "Base64 image bytes copied from the production. Omitted for a URL-only cite. Never present on dry_run.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "mimeType": {
+      "description": "Sniffed image media type (image/png, image/jpeg, image/webp, or image/gif).",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "reviewed": {
+      "description": "True only when data came from an executed production. False for a URL cite without bytes. Never true on dry_run.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "source": {
+      "description": "Production field the image was taken from (for example png_b64, jpeg_b64, or image_url).",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "url": {
+      "description": "Cited http(s) image URL when the production named one. Not invented.",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

changedOutput schema / properties / display / properties / title / description

Previous value: -"Short result title for the AI client."New value: +"Product verb title for the AI client. Not a raw tool name."

Changed2 schema fields changedv2.0.8Sep 27, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / confirm / description

Previous value: -"Documented confirmation flag. Optional in inputSchema.required (connector refresh must not break). tools/call still refuses MCP-CONFIRM-REQUIRED when confirm is missing or false unless dry_run=true (preview, no write)."New value: +"Documented confirmation flag. Optional in inputSchema.required (connector refresh must not break). tools/call still refuses MCP-CONFIRM-REQUIRED when confirm is missing or false unless dry_run=true. confirm is consent to run the call. It is not tenant auth and it does not upgrade shared public-demo isolation."

changedInput schema / properties / dry_run / description

Previous value: -"Optional preview flag. When true, return a would-mutate preview and do not write. Alternative to confirm=true. Does not mutate."New value: +"Optional preview flag. When true, do not write and do not stamp a ledger tip. Allowlist, hallucination, stub, and local-only checks still run and return the same FragGate refuse code a confirm call would get. MCP-DRY-RUN is returned only when that call would have been allowed to proceed. confirm is consent, not tenant auth, and it does not upgrade shared public-demo isolation."

Changed3 schema fields changedv2.0.2Sep 18, 2026

changedInput schema / description

Previous value: -"node_id is required. Missing node_id refuses MESH-BAD-INPUT."New value: +"node_id is required. Missing node_id refuses MESH-BAD-INPUT. Mutation requires confirm=true or dry_run=true."

addedInput schema / properties / confirm

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Documented confirmation flag. Optional in inputSchema.required (connector refresh must not break). tools/call still refuses MCP-CONFIRM-REQUIRED when confirm is missing or false unless dry_run=true (preview, no write).",
+  "type": "boolean"
+}

addedInput schema / properties / dry_run

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Optional preview flag. When true, return a would-mutate preview and do not write. Alternative to confirm=true. Does not mutate.",
+  "type": "boolean"
+}

Addedv1.6.2Sep 12, 2026

TDQS

A4.8/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true, and the description productively extends these: it scopes destruction to 'that node's presence only', states 'No implicit heal', explains that repeating a missing node_id is a 'no-op/refuse, not resurrection', and clarifies that dry_run still returns FragGate refuse codes. This is significant behavioral context beyond the structured annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense and mostly front-loaded: purpose, usage, and exclusions appear early, followed by behavioral and gate details. It is longer than strictly necessary and somewhat repeats the 'confirm is consent, not tenant auth' point that also appears in the schema, but each sentence carries substantive guidance rather than filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity, the annotations, and the presence of an output schema, the description is complete: it covers scope, destructive effect, idempotency edge cases, confirmation/dry_run gates, error-refuse behavior, and return receipt. An agent has enough to decide when to call it and what to expect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds meaning beyond the schema: node_id behavior on repetition, dry_run as a preview that skips writes and ledger stamps, and confirm as consent rather than tenant auth. It still relies on the schema for formal types and requiredness, but the added semantics provide real value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states a specific action and resource: 'Drop one node from the QNM rollup (POST /v1/mesh/leave)' and explicitly distinguishes it from 'suite-wide radio off' and from mesh_nodes/mesh_status. This gives an agent a precise mental model of what the tool does and how it differs from siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives explicit when-to-use guidance ('Use this when a previously joined node should leave the counts') and explicit when-not-to-use guidance with named alternatives ('Do not use it for turning suite-presence off or listing nodes; use mesh_nodes or mesh_status instead'). It also explains the confirm/dry_run gate required for mutation, leaving no ambiguity about invocation preconditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.