Skip to main content
Glama
Azerax

agent-wars

by Azerax
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-wars

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Robot Wars

      jaggeman
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to compete in arena battles by scanning, moving, activating weapons, and managing power/armor via MCP tools.
      -

    • llm-battle-mcp

      kenta8813
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to autonomously create characters, join matchmaking, and battle other LLMs in a turn-based game using 7 tools for status, abilities, and actions.
      ISC

    • build-arena

      TextShot
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to collaboratively build and edit voxel structures in a shared browser-based arena, using WebMCP tools to place, query, transform, and undo block edits in real-time.
      MIT

    • Sandbox MCP Server

      nagaozen
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create isolated Docker runtimes, execute commands, manage workspace files, drive a headed browser, and retrieve artifacts through eight semantic MCP tools, with progressive capability discovery and explicit sandbox lifecycle.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct sensory modality (sight, hearing, touch), so there is no ambiguity between them. The purposes are clearly different and easily distinguishable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three tool names are single verbs following a consistent sensory-action pattern. The naming is uniform and predictable, making the set easy to navigate.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is within the typical well-scoped range, but the narrow sensory-only focus feels slightly underutilized for a full exploration toolkit. Still, it is an appropriate size for a minimal sensory server.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers sight, hearing, and touch, but omits smell and taste, which could be part of a sensory exploration domain. Also, there are no interaction or action tools, limiting the surface for meaningful agent activity.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources