list_deleted_prompt_snippets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description mentions 'soft-deleted' and 'restore candidates', adding behavioral context beyond the name. However, with no annotations, it fails to explicitly state that this is a read-only operation or disclose any side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that conveys the essential purpose and context without any superfluous words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple, no-parameter list tool, the description adequately covers what it lists and why. It lacks detail about the return format, but given the absence of an output schema, the description is mostly sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the schema coverage is 100%. The description adds value by explaining the concept of soft-deleted items and their role for restoration, which goes beyond the empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'List soft-deleted prompt snippets', specifying the verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like 'list_prompt_snippets' by focusing on soft-deleted items and explicitly linking to 'restore_prompt_snippet'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context: this tool lists restore candidates for 'restore_prompt_snippet'. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it or contrast with alternatives like 'list_prompt_snippets' for active snippets.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.