Skip to main content
Glama
Augmented-Nature

Unofficial PubChem MCP Server

get_compound_properties

Retrieve molecular properties like molecular weight, logP, and TPSA for chemical compounds using PubChem Compound IDs to support chemical analysis and research.

Instructions

Get molecular properties (MW, logP, TPSA, etc.)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cidYesPubChem Compound ID (CID)
propertiesNoSpecific properties to retrieve (optional)

Implementation Reference

  • The main handler function that validates input arguments using isValidPropertiesArgs, determines the list of properties to fetch (defaults to common molecular descriptors if not specified), queries the PubChem PUG REST API, and returns the properties as formatted JSON text content.
    private async handleGetCompoundProperties(args: any) {
      if (!isValidPropertiesArgs(args)) {
        throw new McpError(ErrorCode.InvalidParams, 'Invalid compound properties arguments');
      }
    
      try {
        const properties = args.properties || [
          'MolecularWeight', 'XLogP', 'TPSA', 'HBondDonorCount', 'HBondAcceptorCount',
          'RotatableBondCount', 'Complexity', 'HeavyAtomCount', 'Charge'
        ];
    
        const response = await this.apiClient.get(`/compound/cid/${args.cid}/property/${properties.join(',')}/JSON`);
    
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: 'text',
              text: JSON.stringify(response.data, null, 2),
            },
          ],
        };
      } catch (error) {
        throw new McpError(
          ErrorCode.InternalError,
          `Failed to get compound properties: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error'}`
        );
      }
    }
  • src/index.ts:503-514 (registration)
    Tool registration entry in the ListTools response, defining the tool name, description, and input schema for parameter validation.
    {
      name: 'get_compound_properties',
      description: 'Get molecular properties (MW, logP, TPSA, etc.)',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          cid: { type: ['number', 'string'], description: 'PubChem Compound ID (CID)' },
          properties: { type: 'array', items: { type: 'string' }, description: 'Specific properties to retrieve (optional)' },
        },
        required: ['cid'],
      },
    },
  • Type guard function for validating input arguments to the get_compound_properties tool, ensuring cid is provided and properties is an optional string array.
    const isValidPropertiesArgs = (
      args: any
    ): args is { cid: number | string; properties?: string[] } => {
      return (
        typeof args === 'object' &&
        args !== null &&
        (typeof args.cid === 'number' || typeof args.cid === 'string') &&
        (args.properties === undefined || (Array.isArray(args.properties) && args.properties.every((p: any) => typeof p === 'string')))
      );
    };
  • src/index.ts:766-767 (registration)
    Dispatch case in the CallToolRequest handler that routes the tool call to the specific handleGetCompoundProperties method.
    case 'get_compound_properties':
      return await this.handleGetCompoundProperties(args);
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions what properties can be retrieved but lacks details on permissions, rate limits, data sources, or response format. For a read operation with no annotation coverage, this leaves significant gaps in understanding how the tool behaves beyond its basic function.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise and front-loaded, consisting of a single sentence that directly states the tool's purpose with relevant examples. There is no wasted verbiage, making it efficient for quick comprehension.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of molecular property retrieval and the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't address behavioral aspects like data sources, error handling, or return format, which are crucial for an agent to use the tool effectively in a scientific context with many sibling alternatives.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, clearly documenting both parameters (cid and properties). The description adds minimal value by hinting at property types (MW, logP, TPSA), which aligns with the 'properties' parameter but doesn't provide additional syntax or format details beyond what the schema already specifies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose with a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('molecular properties'), and provides examples of the types of properties (MW, logP, TPSA). However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate this tool from sibling tools like 'calculate_descriptors' or 'get_compound_info', which might also retrieve molecular properties, leaving some ambiguity about its unique scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many sibling tools available (e.g., 'get_compound_info', 'calculate_descriptors'), there is no indication of context, prerequisites, or exclusions to help an agent choose appropriately, relying solely on the tool name and basic description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Augmented-Nature/Augmented-Nature-PubChem-MCP-Server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server