misode_get_presets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It describes a read operation listing IDs without side effects, but lacks details on pagination, rate limits, or output format. Adequate for a simple listing tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no waste. Front-loaded with purpose, then usage hint, then sibling reference. Excessively efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and 3 simple parameters, the description is mostly complete: it states what is returned (IDs), how to filter, and cross-references the sibling. Missing details on output format but sufficient for an agent to use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds marginal value by reinforcing generator_type examples and stating search filters. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema already explains parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists vanilla preset IDs for a generator type, with concrete examples. It distinguishes from sibling misode_get_preset_data by noting that this tool returns IDs while the sibling gets full JSON.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains to use search to filter and mentions the sibling for full JSON, providing clear context for when to use this tool versus alternatives. No explicit when-not-to-use instructions, but sufficient for typical usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.