misode_get_generators

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It indicates the tool lists generators with URLs, which is a simple read operation. However, it does not disclose any additional behavioral traits such as rate limits, data freshness, or whether the list is exhaustive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that immediately conveys the purpose and output. No redundant information, and it is front-loaded with the key action 'List all available datapack generators'.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity and the presence of a schema that covers the only parameter, the description adequately explains the return value (list with URLs). It is mostly complete, though it could mention that the listing can be filtered by category.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage for the 'category' parameter is 100%, with description and enum values. The tool description does not mention the parameter or add any additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists all available datapack generators from Misode, with specific examples (loot tables, recipes, etc.) and includes URLs. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like misode_get_loot_tables and misode_get_recipes, which focus on specific generators.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is for getting a general list of generators, but it does not explicitly guide when to use this versus more specific tools like misode_get_loot_tables or misode_get_recipes. No when-not-to-use or alternative guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.