clokio-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to clokio-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables interacting with Clockify time-tracking data through natural language, providing tools to manage workspaces, projects, time entries, reports, and more via the MCP protocol.481MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables personal Clockify time tracking through ChatGPT and other MCP clients, allowing users to manage timers, entries, and reports via natural language.1MIT

Timesheet MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables natural language control of the Timesheet API for timer management, task tracking, and project management through MCP tools.5046 npmMIT- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables time tracking and management in Clockify through natural language commands. Supports creating time entries, managing projects, clients, and tags.139 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Clockify time tracking API to manage time entries, projects, tasks, and workspaces through natural language commands.34 npm5ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables natural language time tracking and booking for WorkTracker via MCP tools, allowing users to assign time, list projects, and manage daily schedules through conversational commands.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 36 tools
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose: tasks, projects, employees, attendance, time entries, balances, comments, dependencies, custom fields. Even similar tools like attendance_daily vs attendance_range are scoped differently. No two tools appear to do the same thing.
All tools share the clokio_ prefix followed by a consistent verb_noun pattern (list_, get_, create_, update_, delete_, set_, add_, clock_in, break_start). The minor variation between 'add' and 'create' aligns with resource types and is predictable.
36 tools is on the higher end, but the server covers a broad domain (project management and HR), so each tool earns its place. It's not bloated with redundant or trivial tools, and the count is justified by the scope.
The tool surface is quite complete for tasks (full CRUD plus assignees, comments, dependencies, custom fields, activity) and employees (create, status, attendance, stats). Minor gaps exist, like no client creation or project update, but these don't break core workflows.