conKurrence
Supports using OpenAI models as independent raters for multi-model evaluation and statistical consensus measurement alongside other AI providers.
This server does not currently have a deployable release on Glama. Follow the repository's setup instructions to install and configure it for your MCP client, including any required credentials and local dependencies.
ConKurrence
Multi-model rating for AI evaluation: measures agreement among model raters (Fleiss' κ, Kendall's W) to find contested items for expert review.
What agreement tells you: where your raters and your criteria are consistent, and where they are not — which items are contested, and whether disagreement comes from the criteria or the raters.
What it does not tell you: that the raters are right. Agreement is reliability, not validity. Models can agree confidently on a wrong answer. Use ConKurrence to decide where an expert's judgment is needed and to diagnose your evaluation criteria — not to replace expert-labelled ground truth.
Status: maintenance mode. ConKurrence is developed by JE Vectors LLC as the evaluation instrument behind Inqura. It is not accepting purchases and carries no support commitment.
Install
npm install -g conkurrenceRelated MCP server: CI-1T Prediction Stability Engine
MCP Server
Use ConKurrence as an MCP server in Claude Desktop or any MCP-compatible client:
npx conkurrence mcpClaude Desktop Configuration
Add to your claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"conkurrence": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "conkurrence", "mcp"]
}
}
}Claude Code Plugin
/plugin marketplace add AlligatorC0der/conkurrenceFeatures
Multi-model evaluation — Run your schema against Bedrock, OpenAI, and Gemini models simultaneously
Agreement statistics — Fleiss' kappa with bootstrap confidence intervals; Kendall's W against expert-labelled anchor items
Self-consistency mode — No API keys needed; uses the host model via MCP Sampling
Schema suggestion — AI-powered schema design from your data
Trend tracking — Compare runs over time, detect agreement degradation
Cost estimation — Know the cost before running
MCP Tools
Tool | Description |
| Execute an evaluation across multiple AI raters |
| Generate a detailed markdown report |
| Side-by-side comparison of two runs |
| Track agreement over multiple runs |
| AI-powered schema suggestion from your data |
| Validate a schema before running |
| Estimate cost and token usage |
Links
Homepage: conkurrence.com
Terms of Service: app.conkurrence.com/terms
Privacy Policy: app.conkurrence.com/privacy
License
BUSL-1.1 — Business Source License 1.1
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelog…
This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
LLM & RAG evals: hallucination, eval contracts, semantic tests, tokens & model info. Free, no key.
Checks if a cheaper model agrees with your GPT, Claude or Gemini outputs, and what routing saves.
Evaluate agent workflows and LLMs on your own data: find wasted steps, pick models, catch drift.
MCP-native AI evaluation: rubric audits, eval suites, and proof reports for AI/LLM output.
Related MCP Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides advanced evaluation tools for assessing AI safety, alignment, and performance of LLM outputs. Enables programmatic evaluation of quality, safety metrics like toxicity and PII detection, and operational metrics including carbon footprint and cost estimation.4Apache 2.0- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenancePrediction stability engine for AI agents. Evaluate model stability, detect ghosts, probe any LLM for instability, monitor fleet drift. 20 tools + 1 resource. Works with Claude, Cursor, VS Code.2020 npm1-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMulti-AI Consensus Tool: Query multiple AI models in parallel, synthesize responses for better accuracy, and reduce AI bias through ensemble decision-making.133MIT

tokonomix-council-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables multi-model consensus decision-making for high-stakes AI decisions, using independent expert models and a judge to surface disagreements and ground decisions.11161 npm1MIT