mcp-devils-advocate
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-devils-advocate
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables users to stress-test decisions and plans with structured contrarian analysis, surfacing blind spots, hidden assumptions, and failure scenarios through multiple modes such as counter, probe, redteam, and premortem.139 npm2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides five rigorous reasoning protocols (debate, red team, audit_argument, threat_model, check_study) that run on the AI you're already using, requiring no extra API keys or costs.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides structured thinking with step-by-step reasoning and steel-manning verification for AI agents, backed by cognitive science research.240 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables structured, iterative reasoning for complex problem-solving with features like confidence tracking, revision mechanisms, and branching support. Provides flexible validation and multiple output formats for systematic analysis and decision-making tasks.134 npm72MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables a structured multi-perspective deliberation workflow where three independent advisors propose strategies, cross-examine one another, and a final arbiter converges on a verdict, with all generation performed by the host agent.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides 8 MCP tools for deterministic, read-only reasoning: intake, routing, planning, rubric, sweep checklist, verdict gate, reflection, and evaluation. It forces scope locks, disconfirmation-first plans, blind-spot sweeps, and evidence-gated verdicts.Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool serves a distinct step in the review workflow: starting, submitting, checking status, getting verdict, exporting, listing, and abandoning. get_verdict and export_report both produce output but are clearly differentiated (compilation vs. shareable export). No overlapping purposes exist.
All names use snake_case and follow an imperative verb pattern. The one exception is 'submit', which lacks a noun, but its purpose is clear from context and the rest are consistently verb_noun.
Seven tools perfectly cover the review lifecycle without redundancy. Each tool is necessary and earns its place, from initiation through final export and cleanup.
The tool set provides full CRUD-like lifecycle coverage for structured reviews: start, submit phase items, track progress, compile verdict, export results, list sessions, and abandon unfinished work. No obvious gaps remain for the stated purpose.