Skip to main content
Glama
AleBrito124356

mcp-devils-advocate

by AleBrito124356
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-devils-advocate

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • kontra-mcp

      bluwork
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to stress-test decisions and plans with structured contrarian analysis, surfacing blind spots, hidden assumptions, and failure scenarios through multiple modes such as counter, probe, redteam, and premortem.
      1
      8 npm
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • Thinking Tools

      PranayMahendrakar
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides five rigorous reasoning protocols (debate, red team, audit_argument, threat_model, check_study) that run on the AI you're already using, requiring no extra API keys or costs.
      MIT

    • Hegelion

      masato89994
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to perform dialectical reasoning (Thesis → Antithesis → Synthesis) and player-coach verified code synthesis through structured MCP tools. It helps catch blind spots and verify requirements by forcing models to argue with themselves before concluding.
      -

    • Hegelion

      aLim08154
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs and MCP-enabled editors to reason dialectically by forcing separate thesis, antithesis, and synthesis passes over questions, plus a player–coach autocoding loop that independently verifies each requirement and iterates until approval. It also supports optional multi-critic review (logician, empiricist, ethicist), web-grounded arguments, and persisted session state.
      -

    • Hegelion

      joannaraymond6754
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run dialectical reasoning workflows and autocoding loops that force models to argue against themselves before concluding. Provides tools for thesis-antithesis-synthesis analysis and independent player-coach code verification.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a distinct step in the review workflow: starting, submitting, checking status, getting verdict, exporting, listing, and abandoning. get_verdict and export_report both produce output but are clearly differentiated (compilation vs. shareable export). No overlapping purposes exist.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case and follow an imperative verb pattern. The one exception is 'submit', which lacks a noun, but its purpose is clear from context and the rest are consistently verb_noun.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools perfectly cover the review lifecycle without redundancy. Each tool is necessary and earns its place, from initiation through final export and cleanup.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides full CRUD-like lifecycle coverage for structured reviews: start, submit phase items, track progress, compile verdict, export results, list sessions, and abandon unfinished work. No obvious gaps remain for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources