This server does not currently have a deployable release on Glama. Follow the repository's setup instructions to install and configure it for your MCP client, including any required credentials and local dependencies.
Five rigorous reasoning protocols for Claude & ChatGPT. Free, open-source, and zero extra credits — they run on the AI you're already talking to.
One MCP server. Works in both Claude and ChatGPT.
Tool | What it does |
| Convenes an expert panel derived from your question, argues it out (steelman → attack), then delivers a verdict with the strongest dissent preserved and what evidence would flip it |
| Steelmans your plan, then hunts hidden assumptions, failure modes, misuse, scaling breakpoints and single points of failure. 12-month pre-mortem. Risks ranked by likelihood × impact, each with the cheapest fix or a falsifying test |
| Reconstructs any text's argument, names quote-anchored fallacies, biases and rhetoric, shows what evidence is missing — and rates argument quality and conclusion truth separately |
| Defensive STRIDE review: assets, actors, trust boundaries, data flows → rated threats, each with a named, located control. Hardening only, never exploits |
| Extracts design/N/baseline/effect size/CI/p from a study or statistic; flags p-hacking, missing controls, survivorship bias, relative-risk inflation; verdict separates weak study from false claim |
The server runs no AI. Each tool returns an expert-designed protocol as plain text; your own Claude/ChatGPT reads it and does the reasoning in the same turn. No API key, no second bill.
That's also why you invoke it explicitly ("Debate this: ..."). An MCP server can't intercept your
message before the AI sees it — that's a platform rule, not a missing feature.
Related MCP server: Think Strategies
Steelman before attacking — never critique a weaker version than you'd defend
Quote before accusing — no quote, no fallacy claim
Never fake consensus — dissent is preserved, split verdicts are reported as split
Invent nothing — no fabricated stats, sources, or citations; uncertain recall is labelled
Separate "bad argument" from "false conclusion" — a bad argument can have a true conclusion
Debate this: should we rewrite the backend in Rust?
Red team my plan: [paste plan]
Audit this argument: [paste article]
Threat model: a public API with JWT auth and Postgres
Check this study: "Coffee cuts heart disease 50%, per a study of 40 people"npm install
npx wrangler deploy # prints your live URLYour connector URL is that address + /mcp.
Claude (any plan): Settings → Connectors → Add custom connector → paste the /mcp URL
ChatGPT (Plus+, desktop web): Settings → Connectors → Advanced → Developer mode → add the /mcp URL, Auth None
⚠️ Use the URL ending in
/mcp— the bare address is just a status page.
MIT © 2026 Pranay Mahendrakar — free to use, modify, and share.
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelog…
This server cannot be deployed
Pre-execution governance for AI agents. Deterministic PASS/FAIL/REVIEW verdicts, replayable proof.
Deterministic reasoning stack for AI agents: simulate, decide & compute, plus cross-domain tools.
Paid deterministic data-quality and execution-verification tools for AI agents.
Context and control for any AI. Agent identity, scoped access, and proof across tools.
