workspace-checkSlugAvailability

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It only states 'checks if available' without disclosing that it is a safe read-only operation or any side effects. The agent cannot infer safety or idempotency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: a single sentence with a brief tag. No wasted words; every part is essential.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema, no annotations, and only one parameter. The description lacks detail on the return value (e.g., boolean) or any behavioral nuance, leaving the agent with incomplete information for a simple availability check.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds no extra meaning to the workspaceSlug parameter. The schema itself defines constraints (pattern, length) which are self-explanatory. Score baseline 3 as the schema carries the burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool checks if a workspace slug is available, distinguishing it from sibling tools like workspace-create that actually create workspaces. However, it could be more specific about what 'available' means (e.g., not already taken).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It is implied for pre-creation validation, but no mention of when not to use or comparisons with workspace-bySlug or workspace-search.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.