board-delete
Delete a board by its public ID to remove it from the Kanban system.
Instructions
Deletes a board by its public ID (Tags: Boards)
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| boardPublicId | Yes |
Delete a board by its public ID to remove it from the Kanban system.
Deletes a board by its public ID (Tags: Boards)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| boardPublicId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Deletes' without mentioning irreversibility, permissions, or side effects. This is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two short lines, efficient. The first line captures the core. The second line '(Tags: Boards)' is slightly redundant but not detrimental.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and simple delete operation, the description could be sufficient, but it lacks context about irreversibility, authorization, or any confirmation. Under minimal annotations, more details are needed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%. The description does not add any meaning beyond the schema for boardPublicId. It merely repeats the concept of 'by its public ID' which is already implied by the parameter name.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Deletes a board' which identifies the verb and resource. Among sibling tools like board-create and board-update, it is distinct.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use versus alternatives, no prerequisites or exclusions. The description does not help decide between board-delete and other board operations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/AixLabTech/kanbn-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server