permission-resetWorkspaceMemberPermissions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description provides basic behavior (clearing overrides) but lacks details on reversibility, side effects, or permission requirements. It mentions the outcome of effective permissions coming from roles, which is helpful but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one sentence, but includes a dangling tag '(Tags: Permissions)' that adds noise. Otherwise concise and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not mention prerequisites (e.g., admin role), whether the action is reversible, or what the response looks like. For a bulk reset operation, more context is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not mention the 'workspacePublicId' parameter. The parameter name is somewhat self-explanatory, but the description adds no value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'clears' and the resource 'all custom permission overrides for all members in a workspace'. It distinguishes from siblings like permission-resetMemberPermissions which targets a single member.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use: to remove all custom overrides so permissions come only from roles. It does not explicitly exclude alternatives like permission-resetMemberPermissions, but the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.